On Addressing Societal Challenges: The Influence of Archetypal Biases on Scaling Social Innovation

Abstract The purpose of this article is to encourage greater reflexivity among social innovation practitioners and researchers about the influence of unconscious biases and assumptions on addressing societal challenges. Drawing on previous research and insights gained from our 30 + years’ experience in practice, we present four archetypes of social innovation. Each archetype is rooted in an underlying paradigm of organizational sociology. We outline how the archetypes fundamentally shape how social innovations are prioritized and supported to scale through the influence of unconscious biases. These inherent biases both illuminate and obscure different aspects of social innovation scaling processes. The presented archetypes are significant as they impact the ethical, normative dimensions of social innovation to address societal challenges and opinions about what types of supports should be provided. Through highlighting the different assumptions that underpin each archetype, we advocate for practitioners and researchers to develop greater reflexivity about their own cognitive and normative biases when considering how social innovation scaling can address societal challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-025-05975-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Addressing Societal Challenges: The Influence of Archetypal Biases on Scaling Social Innovation

Gemma Donnelly‐Cox, Jeffrey Hughes, John J. Healy
1 citations
Journal of Business Ethics
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
2.45
article

On Addressing Societal Challenges: The Influence of Archetypal Biases on Scaling Social Innovation

Gemma Donnelly‐Cox, Jeffrey Hughes, John J. Healy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this article is to encourage greater reflexivity among social innovation practitioners and researchers about the influence of unconscious biases and assumptions on addressing societal challenges. Drawing on previous research and insights gained from our 30 + years’ experience in practice, we present four archetypes of social innovation. Each archetype is rooted in an underlying paradigm of organizational sociology. We outline how the archetypes fundamentally shape how social innovations are prioritized and supported to scale through the influence of unconscious biases. These inherent biases both illuminate and obscure different aspects of social innovation scaling processes. The presented archetypes are significant as they impact the ethical, normative dimensions of social innovation to address societal challenges and opinions about what types of supports should be provided. Through highlighting the different assumptions that underpin each archetype, we advocate for practitioners and researchers to develop greater reflexivity about their own cognitive and normative biases when considering how social innovation scaling can address societal challenges.

Journal of Business EthicsVol. 202(3)
Durham University (GB), Trinity College Dublin (IE), Gene Therapy Laboratory (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
2.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On Addressing Societal Challenges: The Influence of Archetypal Biases on Scaling Social Innovation — Gemma Donnelly‐Cox, Jeffrey Hughes, et al. · Journal of Business Ethics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS