A comparative analysis of nanoparticle aggregation and non-aggregation in a nanofluid flow over a cylinder influenced by prescribed surface temperature

Purpose Nanofluids enhance heat transfer due to the inclusion of nanoparticles, but the exact reasons remain debated. Limited nanoscale experiments hinder understanding. To investigate the thermal effects of nanoparticles, understanding nanoparticle aggregation kinetics is crucial. Nanoparticles have applications in various industrial fields. This study compares the effects of nanoparticle aggregation and non-aggregation in a nanofluid flow influenced by an inclined magnetic field around an expanding or shrinking cylinder, incorporating the generalized Fourier law with a prescribed surface temperature. Design/methodology/approach The model problem is solved numerically with the bvp4c finite difference collocation method, known for its accuracy. Findings Graphs and tables illustrate how key factors affect velocity and thermal fields. The results revealed that for stretching flows, fluid velocity increases with higher nanoparticle concentrations and velocity slip, while shrinking flows show opposite trends. The drag force decreases with rising Hartmann numbers and nanoparticle volume fraction, irrespective of aggregation. Surface drag is more affected by aggregation than non-aggregation in both shrinking and expanding cases. The study also validates the proposed model. Originality/value Before this, numerous attempts discussed aggregation and non-aggregation separately on a deforming cylinder. Nevertheless, no study has yet assessed the impact of a slanted magnetic field on comparing the effects of nanoparticle aggregation versus non-aggregation in nanoliquid flow over a deformable or shrinking cylinder. This seems to be the first attempt to compare nanoparticle aggregation versus non-aggregation in nanoliquid flow.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mmms-10-2024-0319
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of nanoparticle aggregation and non-aggregation in a nanofluid flow over a cylinder influenced by prescribed surface temperature

Abdulkafi Mohammed Saeed, Muhammad Ramzan, Ibtehal Alazman, C. Ahamed Saleel et al.
2 citations
Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
1.35
article

A comparative analysis of nanoparticle aggregation and non-aggregation in a nanofluid flow over a cylinder influenced by prescribed surface temperature

Abdulkafi Mohammed Saeed, Muhammad Ramzan, Ibtehal Alazman, C. Ahamed Saleel, Seifedine Kadry, Naila Shaheen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose Nanofluids enhance heat transfer due to the inclusion of nanoparticles, but the exact reasons remain debated. Limited nanoscale experiments hinder understanding. To investigate the thermal effects of nanoparticles, understanding nanoparticle aggregation kinetics is crucial. Nanoparticles have applications in various industrial fields. This study compares the effects of nanoparticle aggregation and non-aggregation in a nanofluid flow influenced by an inclined magnetic field around an expanding or shrinking cylinder, incorporating the generalized Fourier law with a prescribed surface temperature. Design/methodology/approach The model problem is solved numerically with the bvp4c finite difference collocation method, known for its accuracy. Findings Graphs and tables illustrate how key factors affect velocity and thermal fields. The results revealed that for stretching flows, fluid velocity increases with higher nanoparticle concentrations and velocity slip, while shrinking flows show opposite trends. The drag force decreases with rising Hartmann numbers and nanoparticle volume fraction, irrespective of aggregation. Surface drag is more affected by aggregation than non-aggregation in both shrinking and expanding cases. The study also validates the proposed model. Originality/value Before this, numerous attempts discussed aggregation and non-aggregation separately on a deforming cylinder. Nevertheless, no study has yet assessed the impact of a slanted magnetic field on comparing the effects of nanoparticle aggregation versus non-aggregation in nanoliquid flow over a deformable or shrinking cylinder. This seems to be the first attempt to compare nanoparticle aggregation versus non-aggregation in nanoliquid flow.

Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and StructuresVol. 21(4)
Qassim University (SA), Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA), Lebanese American University (LB), Bahria University (PK), King Khalid University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.