Suppression potential of selected vermicomposts against root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) under in vitro, pot, and field conditions

The root-knot nematode <i>Meloidogyne incognita</i> presents a serious threat to high-value crops in tropical and subtropical regions, particularly in Ethiopia, causing substantial yield and quality losses. Vermicompost, whether applied in solid form or as an extract, has shown promise in managing root-knot nematodes (RKNs). However, its effectiveness is influenced by factors such as the quality and type of vermicompost, the application rate, and the composition of parasitic nematode communities in the soil. This study utilized selected vermicomposts at varying rates in in vitro, pot, and field experiments to evaluate their potential for suppressing <i>M. incognita</i> and their effects on the growth and yield of tomato and hot pepper. The <i>in vitro</i> experiments demonstrated that all vermicompost extracts exhibited toxicity to J2. In particular, VC10 and VC11 showed higher efficacy, resulting in 55% and 78% mortality of J2 after 24 and 72 h of exposure, respectively, compared to the control and VC12. The interaction between vermicompost type, application rate, and nematode density significantly influenced tomato growth and nematode parameters in the pot experiment. The application of VC10 and VC11 at high doses (10 and 20 t ha<sup>-1</sup>) and low nematode density (50 J2) increased root fresh weight while reducing galls and nematode populations in tomato roots. Conversely, VC12 at a high application rate (20 t ha<sup>-1</sup>) and high nematode density (500 J2) led to an increase in root galls and nematode populations, suggesting a preference for RKNs rather than the expected nematicidal effect. The study indicates that the suppressive effect of vermicompost on nematodes varies with nematode density, depending on the type and amount of vermicompost used. Field experiments revealed that vermicompost amendments not only suppressed posttreatment nematode populations but also significantly improved hot pepper yield. Particularly, VC10 applied at high rates (10 and 20 t ha-1) resulted in lower nematode densities and higher marketable fruit yield compared to other vermicompost treatments and the conventional treatments (control, farmer practice, and recommended fertilizer). This highlights the long-term benefits of vermicompost application for nematode management and soil health. In addition, vermicompost amendments improved soil chemical properties. Overall, vermicompost offers greater benefits than farmers' practices and high-cost chemical fertilizers for soil improvement, while also enhancing tomato and hot pepper yields in nematode-infested smallholder farms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Plant Science
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1532800
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Nematode management and characterization studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Suppression potential of selected vermicomposts against root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) under in vitro, pot, and field conditions

Mesfin Tsegaye Gebremikael, Sheleme Beyene, Stefaan De Neve, Zerihun Getachew Gebrehana et al.
4 citations
Frontiers in Plant Science
Nematode management and characterization studies
7.00
article

Suppression potential of selected vermicomposts against root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) under in vitro, pot, and field conditions

Mesfin Tsegaye Gebremikael, Sheleme Beyene, Stefaan De Neve, Zerihun Getachew Gebrehana, Wim Wesemael
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The root-knot nematode <i>Meloidogyne incognita</i> presents a serious threat to high-value crops in tropical and subtropical regions, particularly in Ethiopia, causing substantial yield and quality losses. Vermicompost, whether applied in solid form or as an extract, has shown promise in managing root-knot nematodes (RKNs). However, its effectiveness is influenced by factors such as the quality and type of vermicompost, the application rate, and the composition of parasitic nematode communities in the soil. This study utilized selected vermicomposts at varying rates in in vitro, pot, and field experiments to evaluate their potential for suppressing <i>M. incognita</i> and their effects on the growth and yield of tomato and hot pepper. The <i>in vitro</i> experiments demonstrated that all vermicompost extracts exhibited toxicity to J2. In particular, VC10 and VC11 showed higher efficacy, resulting in 55% and 78% mortality of J2 after 24 and 72 h of exposure, respectively, compared to the control and VC12. The interaction between vermicompost type, application rate, and nematode density significantly influenced tomato growth and nematode parameters in the pot experiment. The application of VC10 and VC11 at high doses (10 and 20 t ha<sup>-1</sup>) and low nematode density (50 J2) increased root fresh weight while reducing galls and nematode populations in tomato roots. Conversely, VC12 at a high application rate (20 t ha<sup>-1</sup>) and high nematode density (500 J2) led to an increase in root galls and nematode populations, suggesting a preference for RKNs rather than the expected nematicidal effect. The study indicates that the suppressive effect of vermicompost on nematodes varies with nematode density, depending on the type and amount of vermicompost used. Field experiments revealed that vermicompost amendments not only suppressed posttreatment nematode populations but also significantly improved hot pepper yield. Particularly, VC10 applied at high rates (10 and 20 t ha-1) resulted in lower nematode densities and higher marketable fruit yield compared to other vermicompost treatments and the conventional treatments (control, farmer practice, and recommended fertilizer). This highlights the long-term benefits of vermicompost application for nematode management and soil health. In addition, vermicompost amendments improved soil chemical properties. Overall, vermicompost offers greater benefits than farmers' practices and high-cost chemical fertilizers for soil improvement, while also enhancing tomato and hot pepper yields in nematode-infested smallholder farms.

Frontiers in Plant ScienceVol. 16
Hawassa University (ET), Aarhus University (DK), Ghent University (BE), Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (ET)
Universiteit Gent, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Nematode management and characterization studies
7.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.