Examining the potential and pitfalls of AI in problem solving

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into mathematical problem-solving has shown significant potential to enhance student learning and performance. However, while AI tools offer numerous benefits, they are prone to occasional conceptual and arithmetic errors that can mislead users and obscure understanding. This research examines such errors to improve the role of AI in solving mathematical problems. The study particularly assesses the abilities of AI tools—ChatGPT-4, Gemini, and CoPilot—in addressing proportional reasoning errors commonly made by students. ChatGPT-4 achieved the highest accuracy rate among the tested tools, correctly answering 10 out of 14 questions. Additionally, ChatGPT-4 provided more detailed explanations in its responses, with a higher word count compared to the other tools. However, all tools replicated certain errors commonly made by students on specific reasoning questions. In conclusion, while AI tools hold promise for enhancing mathematics education, they still have limitations. Improving AI’s contextual understanding and problem-solving adaptability could lead to the development of more robust educational tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pedagogical Research
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.202532099
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cognitive Science and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the potential and pitfalls of AI in problem solving

Yasin Memiş
1 citations
Journal of Pedagogical Research
Cognitive Science and Mapping
2.48
article

Examining the potential and pitfalls of AI in problem solving

Yasin Memiş
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into mathematical problem-solving has shown significant potential to enhance student learning and performance. However, while AI tools offer numerous benefits, they are prone to occasional conceptual and arithmetic errors that can mislead users and obscure understanding. This research examines such errors to improve the role of AI in solving mathematical problems. The study particularly assesses the abilities of AI tools—ChatGPT-4, Gemini, and CoPilot—in addressing proportional reasoning errors commonly made by students. ChatGPT-4 achieved the highest accuracy rate among the tested tools, correctly answering 10 out of 14 questions. Additionally, ChatGPT-4 provided more detailed explanations in its responses, with a higher word count compared to the other tools. However, all tools replicated certain errors commonly made by students on specific reasoning questions. In conclusion, while AI tools hold promise for enhancing mathematics education, they still have limitations. Improving AI’s contextual understanding and problem-solving adaptability could lead to the development of more robust educational tools.

Journal of Pedagogical Research
Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cognitive Science and Mapping
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Examining the potential and pitfalls of AI in problem solving — Yasin Memiş · Journal of Pedagogical Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS