Experimental study of LSF truss floor-ceiling systems made of top hat sections

• Investigated the behaviour of load bearing LSF truss floor-ceiling systems made of top hat sections. • Identified the complex failure mechanisms of top hat trusses, including early local buckling failures of unlipped sections. • The use of nylon spacers and screws significantly delayed the early failures of diagonal web compression members. • Removing the lips and edge stiffeners at the ends of web members led to about 50% reduction in their capacity. • Highlighted the need to consider combined compression-bending actions and unlipped sections when designing web members. Light gauge steel framed (LSF) floor-ceiling systems, which employ cold-formed steel (CFS) joists, offer high strength, fast construction and cost-effectiveness. CFS trusses are examples of such joists with several advantages over conventional lipped channel joists. However, limited research exists on LSF truss floor-ceiling systems made of top hat sections, despite their popularity. This study addressed this gap by examining the flexural behaviour of LSF truss floor-ceiling systems made of top hat sections through a series of four-point bending tests. The experiments were conducted with variations in support conditions, truss configurations, top hat thickness, and the types of fasteners used in web-to-chord connections. Test results highlighted the complex failure mechanisms of top hat trusses, including early local buckling failures at the removed lips and edge stiffeners near the ends of diagonal web members. The use of nylon spacers and additional screws to the bolt connections proved effective in delaying early web member failures. Tested trusses did not fail abruptly, instead, the loads were redistributed to other members, resulting in higher ultimate failure loads. A comparison with the current truss design method which is based on elastic analysis to determine member forces and the direct strength method (DSM) to calculate member capacities showed that this approach overestimates the truss failure loads, particularly where web-to-chord connections had only one bolt. This research underscores the need to consider combined compression-bending actions when designing web members with eccentric connections and to strengthen these connections to prevent or delay early local buckling failures. It also highlights the importance of considering the unlipped portion of web members at connections when designing top hat trusses and provides design recommendations for top hat truss floor systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thin-Walled Structures
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2025.113193
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental study of LSF truss floor-ceiling systems made of top hat sections

Gihan Ranasinghe, Son Tung Vy, Anthony Ariyanayagam, Mahen Mahendran
3 citations
Thin-Walled Structures
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
2.86
article

Experimental study of LSF truss floor-ceiling systems made of top hat sections

Gihan Ranasinghe, Son Tung Vy, Anthony Ariyanayagam, Mahen Mahendran
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Investigated the behaviour of load bearing LSF truss floor-ceiling systems made of top hat sections. • Identified the complex failure mechanisms of top hat trusses, including early local buckling failures of unlipped sections. • The use of nylon spacers and screws significantly delayed the early failures of diagonal web compression members. • Removing the lips and edge stiffeners at the ends of web members led to about 50% reduction in their capacity. • Highlighted the need to consider combined compression-bending actions and unlipped sections when designing web members. Light gauge steel framed (LSF) floor-ceiling systems, which employ cold-formed steel (CFS) joists, offer high strength, fast construction and cost-effectiveness. CFS trusses are examples of such joists with several advantages over conventional lipped channel joists. However, limited research exists on LSF truss floor-ceiling systems made of top hat sections, despite their popularity. This study addressed this gap by examining the flexural behaviour of LSF truss floor-ceiling systems made of top hat sections through a series of four-point bending tests. The experiments were conducted with variations in support conditions, truss configurations, top hat thickness, and the types of fasteners used in web-to-chord connections. Test results highlighted the complex failure mechanisms of top hat trusses, including early local buckling failures at the removed lips and edge stiffeners near the ends of diagonal web members. The use of nylon spacers and additional screws to the bolt connections proved effective in delaying early web member failures. Tested trusses did not fail abruptly, instead, the loads were redistributed to other members, resulting in higher ultimate failure loads. A comparison with the current truss design method which is based on elastic analysis to determine member forces and the direct strength method (DSM) to calculate member capacities showed that this approach overestimates the truss failure loads, particularly where web-to-chord connections had only one bolt. This research underscores the need to consider combined compression-bending actions when designing web members with eccentric connections and to strengthen these connections to prevent or delay early local buckling failures. It also highlights the importance of considering the unlipped portion of web members at connections when designing top hat trusses and provides design recommendations for top hat truss floor systems.

Thin-Walled StructuresVol. 212
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.