X‐Ray and Electron Spectroscopy of the CdS/(Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se<sub>2</sub> Interface With RbF Treatment

Abstract The chemical and electronic structure of the CdS/(Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se 2 (CdS/ACIGSe) interface for thin‐film solar cells, involving an absorber with a bulk [Ag]/([Ag]+[Cu]) (AAC) ratio of 0.06, a state‐of‐the‐art RbF post‐deposition treatment (PDT), and a chemical‐bath deposited CdS buffer layer, is studied. To gain a detailed and depth‐resolved picture of the CdS/ACIGSe interface, synchrotron‐ and laboratory‐based hard X‐ray, soft X‐ray, and UV photoelectron spectroscopy, inverse photoemission spectroscopy, and X‐ray emission spectroscopy are combined. Compared to the bulk of the absorber, a Cu‐ and Ga‐poor ACIGSe surface is found, with a slightly increased AAC ratio. Strong evidence of a Rb–In–Se species (possibly with some Ag) at the absorber surface is compiled, with a corresponding band gap of 2.79 ± 0.12 eV. This finding is in clear contrast to comparable Ag‐free Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 absorbers with RbF‐PDT. The Rb–In–Se surface species is not removed by the (wet‐chemical) CdS deposition process, while some Se diffuses into the CdS layer and segregates at its surface. The CdS buffer layer shows a band gap of 2.48 ± 0.12 eV, and a cliff (≈ −0.4 eV) is determined in the conduction band alignment at the interface between the Rb–In–Se species and the CdS buffer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Materials Interfaces
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202401002
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

X‐Ray and Electron Spectroscopy of the CdS/(Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se2 Interface With RbF Treatment

Clemens Heske, Dimitrios Hariskos, L. Weinhardt, Michael Powalla et al.
3 citations
Advanced Materials Interfaces
Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
2.19
article

X‐Ray and Electron Spectroscopy of the CdS/(Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se2 Interface With RbF Treatment

Clemens Heske, Dimitrios Hariskos, L. Weinhardt, Michael Powalla, Constantin Wansorra, Rico Gutzler, Mary Blankenship, Wanli Yang, Dirk Hauschild, Wolfram Witte, Ralph Steininger, Luisa Both
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The chemical and electronic structure of the CdS/(Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se 2 (CdS/ACIGSe) interface for thin‐film solar cells, involving an absorber with a bulk [Ag]/([Ag]+[Cu]) (AAC) ratio of 0.06, a state‐of‐the‐art RbF post‐deposition treatment (PDT), and a chemical‐bath deposited CdS buffer layer, is studied. To gain a detailed and depth‐resolved picture of the CdS/ACIGSe interface, synchrotron‐ and laboratory‐based hard X‐ray, soft X‐ray, and UV photoelectron spectroscopy, inverse photoemission spectroscopy, and X‐ray emission spectroscopy are combined. Compared to the bulk of the absorber, a Cu‐ and Ga‐poor ACIGSe surface is found, with a slightly increased AAC ratio. Strong evidence of a Rb–In–Se species (possibly with some Ag) at the absorber surface is compiled, with a corresponding band gap of 2.79 ± 0.12 eV. This finding is in clear contrast to comparable Ag‐free Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 absorbers with RbF‐PDT. The Rb–In–Se surface species is not removed by the (wet‐chemical) CdS deposition process, while some Se diffuses into the CdS layer and segregates at its surface. The CdS buffer layer shows a band gap of 2.48 ± 0.12 eV, and a cliff (≈ −0.4 eV) is determined in the conduction band alignment at the interface between the Rb–In–Se species and the CdS buffer.

Advanced Materials InterfacesVol. 12(11)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), Zentrum für Sonnenenergie- und Wasserstoff-Forschung Baden-Württemberg (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.