Comparative Analysis of Ayurvedic and Allopathic Medicine Preferences Among Bachelor's Level Students

Background: The coexistence of Ayurvedic and allopathic systems of medicine reflects a growing trend toward integrating traditional and modern healthcare approaches. While Ayurveda emphasizes natural healing and holistic well-being, allopathic medicine is often preferred for its efficacy in treating acute conditions. Understanding healthcare preferences among young adults, particularly Bachelor Running students aged 18-25, is crucial for designing effective healthcare strategies that cater to their unique needs. Objective: This study aimed to assess preferences for Ayurvedic and allopathic systems among Bachelor Running students, focusing on common health issues such as minor injuries, common colds, fever, headaches, and diarrhea. The study also explored the influence of gender and marital status on these preferences. Method: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 200 Bachelor Running students aged 18-25 from Baneshwor Multiple Campus, Kathmandu, Nepal. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire that assessed preferences for Ayurvedic and allopathic systems for five common health issues, along with demographic information. Descriptive statistics and Chi-Square tests were used to analyze the data. Findings: The results revealed significant gender-based differences in preferences for treating common colds (p = 0.022) and fever (p = 0.037), with one gender more likely to favor Ayurvedic or allopathic systems than the other. However, gender did not significantly influence preferences for minor injuries, headaches, or diarrhea. Marital status showed no significant association with preferences for any of the health conditions examined. Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of considering gender-specific factors when designing healthcare interventions, as gender significantly influences preferences for treating common colds and fever. Preferences for other health conditions are likely shaped by cultural beliefs, accessibility, and prior experiences rather than demographic variables. These findings underscore the need for a balanced approach that integrates traditional and modern healthcare systems to meet the diverse needs of young adults. Novelty: This study contributes to the limited literature on healthcare preferences among young adults, particularly in the context of Ayurvedic and allopathic systems. It provides new insights into the role of gender in shaping preferences for common health issues and highlights the need for further research on other potential determinants of healthcare decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3126/njmr.v8i1.76514
Primary Topic
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Ayurvedic and Allopathic Medicine Preferences Among Bachelor's Level Students

Pushkar Singh Raikhola
Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
article

Comparative Analysis of Ayurvedic and Allopathic Medicine Preferences Among Bachelor's Level Students

Pushkar Singh Raikhola
article en

Abstract

Background: The coexistence of Ayurvedic and allopathic systems of medicine reflects a growing trend toward integrating traditional and modern healthcare approaches. While Ayurveda emphasizes natural healing and holistic well-being, allopathic medicine is often preferred for its efficacy in treating acute conditions. Understanding healthcare preferences among young adults, particularly Bachelor Running students aged 18-25, is crucial for designing effective healthcare strategies that cater to their unique needs. Objective: This study aimed to assess preferences for Ayurvedic and allopathic systems among Bachelor Running students, focusing on common health issues such as minor injuries, common colds, fever, headaches, and diarrhea. The study also explored the influence of gender and marital status on these preferences. Method: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 200 Bachelor Running students aged 18-25 from Baneshwor Multiple Campus, Kathmandu, Nepal. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire that assessed preferences for Ayurvedic and allopathic systems for five common health issues, along with demographic information. Descriptive statistics and Chi-Square tests were used to analyze the data. Findings: The results revealed significant gender-based differences in preferences for treating common colds (p = 0.022) and fever (p = 0.037), with one gender more likely to favor Ayurvedic or allopathic systems than the other. However, gender did not significantly influence preferences for minor injuries, headaches, or diarrhea. Marital status showed no significant association with preferences for any of the health conditions examined. Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of considering gender-specific factors when designing healthcare interventions, as gender significantly influences preferences for treating common colds and fever. Preferences for other health conditions are likely shaped by cultural beliefs, accessibility, and prior experiences rather than demographic variables. These findings underscore the need for a balanced approach that integrates traditional and modern healthcare systems to meet the diverse needs of young adults. Novelty: This study contributes to the limited literature on healthcare preferences among young adults, particularly in the context of Ayurvedic and allopathic systems. It provides new insights into the role of gender in shaping preferences for common health issues and highlights the need for further research on other potential determinants of healthcare decision-making.

Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 8(1)
Tribhuvan University (NP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.