Does the visibility of destination matter more than distance in human navigation? A pilot virtual reality study

Navigational decisions depend on both cognitive maps and immediate sensory experiences of the environment. However, when both cognitive maps and immediate sensory experiences are uncertain, it is unclear how decisions are made. Here, we question whether visibility of the destination matters more than the distance to that destination as constructed by our cognitive map [Tolman, E. C. 1948. “Cognitive Maps in Rats and men.” Psychological Review 55 (4): 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061626]. We used Virtual Reality to create an embodied navigation task in a uniform environment, where we varied visibility and distance. Participants located two spheres in the environment and were then instructed to find one of them in a subsequent trial. Participants’ choices and movement were analysed. We find that participants base their navigational decisions on distance rather than visibility, favouring shorter distances over visibility. We find that cognitive maps surpass visual appearance, and embodied interactions are crucial for navigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Architectural Science Review
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2025.2476648
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does the visibility of destination matter more than distance in human navigation? A pilot virtual reality study

Zakaria Djebbara, Tsila Yaloz, Cecilie Marie Busk, Maibritt Dammann et al.
3 citations
Architectural Science Review
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
2.05
article

Does the visibility of destination matter more than distance in human navigation? A pilot virtual reality study

Zakaria Djebbara, Tsila Yaloz, Cecilie Marie Busk, Maibritt Dammann, Christina Lomholt, Mille Boye Nielsen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Navigational decisions depend on both cognitive maps and immediate sensory experiences of the environment. However, when both cognitive maps and immediate sensory experiences are uncertain, it is unclear how decisions are made. Here, we question whether visibility of the destination matters more than the distance to that destination as constructed by our cognitive map [Tolman, E. C. 1948. “Cognitive Maps in Rats and men.” Psychological Review 55 (4): 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061626]. We used Virtual Reality to create an embodied navigation task in a uniform environment, where we varied visibility and distance. Participants located two spheres in the environment and were then instructed to find one of them in a subsequent trial. Participants’ choices and movement were analysed. We find that participants base their navigational decisions on distance rather than visibility, favouring shorter distances over visibility. We find that cognitive maps surpass visual appearance, and embodied interactions are crucial for navigation.

Architectural Science Review
Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.