A living lab learning framework rooted in learning theories

Complex issues like sustainable land and water management demand a transdisciplinary and collaborative approach, such as that of living labs, bridging between science, policy, and society. Living labs facilitate active collaboration among diverse actors from public and private sectors, research institutes, and civil society, creating an environment that fosters innovations to address environmental challenges. However, the impact of these labs is often assessed based only on their immediate results, overlooking the potential effects of learning during co-creation activities. Thus, this paper develops a framework that allows to capture learning in a living lab co-creative environment. In response to widespread calls for an epistemological basis for living labs, the study bases the framework on relevant learning theories. First, the literature dealing with learning theories relevant to the characteristics of living labs is reviewed. The relevant theories are identified as: behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism, experimental, situated, social, organizational, transformative, and connectivism. Next, the insights on learning theories are used in developing a Living Lab Learning Framework with three interacting components: A. Learning types ( what ), B. Learning process ( how ), and C. Learning levels ( who ), contributing to learning outcomes. The framework distinguishes content, capacity, and network as learning types; intentional or incidental as learning processes; and individual, team, and organization as learning levels. Finally, the potential application of the framework during the initiation, implementation, and evaluation project phases of living labs is highlighted. The framework is envisaged to extend the impacts of living labs beyond immediate results by providing a systematic method for assessing learning and its outcomes and generating insights regarding future improvements in the configuration of living lab learning environments. • Living Labs can be effective in achieving sustainable land and water management. • The impacts deriving from learning in Living Labs are often overlooked. • The analytical learning framework helps identify learning in co-creation activities. • Framework's grounding in learning theories provides a strong theoretical foundation. • The framework can be applied fully or partially in different phases of Living Labs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107894
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A living lab learning framework rooted in learning theories

Astha Bhatta, Jill H. Slinger, Heleen S.I. Vreugdenhil
3 citations
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
8.28
article

A living lab learning framework rooted in learning theories

Astha Bhatta, Jill H. Slinger, Heleen S.I. Vreugdenhil
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Complex issues like sustainable land and water management demand a transdisciplinary and collaborative approach, such as that of living labs, bridging between science, policy, and society. Living labs facilitate active collaboration among diverse actors from public and private sectors, research institutes, and civil society, creating an environment that fosters innovations to address environmental challenges. However, the impact of these labs is often assessed based only on their immediate results, overlooking the potential effects of learning during co-creation activities. Thus, this paper develops a framework that allows to capture learning in a living lab co-creative environment. In response to widespread calls for an epistemological basis for living labs, the study bases the framework on relevant learning theories. First, the literature dealing with learning theories relevant to the characteristics of living labs is reviewed. The relevant theories are identified as: behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism, experimental, situated, social, organizational, transformative, and connectivism. Next, the insights on learning theories are used in developing a Living Lab Learning Framework with three interacting components: A. Learning types ( what ), B. Learning process ( how ), and C. Learning levels ( who ), contributing to learning outcomes. The framework distinguishes content, capacity, and network as learning types; intentional or incidental as learning processes; and individual, team, and organization as learning levels. Finally, the potential application of the framework during the initiation, implementation, and evaluation project phases of living labs is highlighted. The framework is envisaged to extend the impacts of living labs beyond immediate results by providing a systematic method for assessing learning and its outcomes and generating insights regarding future improvements in the configuration of living lab learning environments. • Living Labs can be effective in achieving sustainable land and water management. • The impacts deriving from learning in Living Labs are often overlooked. • The analytical learning framework helps identify learning in co-creation activities. • Framework's grounding in learning theories provides a strong theoretical foundation. • The framework can be applied fully or partially in different phases of Living Labs.

Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewVol. 114
Rhodes University (ZA), Deltares (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
8.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.