Is the workforce ready? A look at operational health and safety in additive manufacturing

• Significant gaps in AM OHS knowledge exist due to the industry’s rapid growth. • Safety factors depend on specific materials, techniques, and processes used. • There’s growing safety awareness and automation in the industry. • The survey and focus group interviews revealed knowledge gaps in AM OHS. • More global research and education on AM OHS are necessary. AM is a rapidly growing and developing industry. As a novel industry, it has been acknowledged that there is a need for research done in the area of occupational health and safety (OHS). This study considers the perspective of the AM technology users and how they receive and implement safety information and what are the gaps and development needs in the area. The study was conducted in two steps. First, a comprehensive survey on general OHS topics among international AM professionals was carried out. Second, a focus group interview was conducted with Finnish survey participants. This longitudinal mixed-methods research allowed the collection of OHS information over five years. Data from the survey and focus group interviews were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The results of both survey and focus group interviews indicated that AM technology users have realized they have knowledge gaps in AM safety, especially concerning comprehensive external training. The focus group interviews highlighted a strong culture of self-directed learning and feeling that research on safety of additive manufacturing remains fragmented. Together, this conveys a strong notion that further global research and education on AM-related OHS are necessary to provide better safety guidance to all AM users, including those in industrial, hobbyist, and office. However, to achieve sustainable and safe growth in the AM field, concerted efforts from manufacturers, industry professionals, and regulatory bodies are essential. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is pioneering study to gain insight into how AM technology users themselves view OHS issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety Science
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106842
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is the workforce ready? A look at operational health and safety in additive manufacturing

Iñigo Flores Ituarte, Anna‐Kaisa Viitanen, Sergei Chekurov, Kirsi Kukko
2 citations
Safety Science
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
1.37
article

Is the workforce ready? A look at operational health and safety in additive manufacturing

Iñigo Flores Ituarte, Anna‐Kaisa Viitanen, Sergei Chekurov, Kirsi Kukko
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Significant gaps in AM OHS knowledge exist due to the industry’s rapid growth. • Safety factors depend on specific materials, techniques, and processes used. • There’s growing safety awareness and automation in the industry. • The survey and focus group interviews revealed knowledge gaps in AM OHS. • More global research and education on AM OHS are necessary. AM is a rapidly growing and developing industry. As a novel industry, it has been acknowledged that there is a need for research done in the area of occupational health and safety (OHS). This study considers the perspective of the AM technology users and how they receive and implement safety information and what are the gaps and development needs in the area. The study was conducted in two steps. First, a comprehensive survey on general OHS topics among international AM professionals was carried out. Second, a focus group interview was conducted with Finnish survey participants. This longitudinal mixed-methods research allowed the collection of OHS information over five years. Data from the survey and focus group interviews were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The results of both survey and focus group interviews indicated that AM technology users have realized they have knowledge gaps in AM safety, especially concerning comprehensive external training. The focus group interviews highlighted a strong culture of self-directed learning and feeling that research on safety of additive manufacturing remains fragmented. Together, this conveys a strong notion that further global research and education on AM-related OHS are necessary to provide better safety guidance to all AM users, including those in industrial, hobbyist, and office. However, to achieve sustainable and safe growth in the AM field, concerted efforts from manufacturers, industry professionals, and regulatory bodies are essential. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is pioneering study to gain insight into how AM technology users themselves view OHS issues.

Safety ScienceVol. 187
Tampere University (FI), Spinverse (Finland) (FI), Aalto University (FI)
Työsuojelurahasto, Business Finland
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
1.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.