Artificial Intelligence Assisted Creativity: Conceptualization, Instrument Development and Validation

ABSTRACT Considering the pivotal role of creativity across various eras and the rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in both creative processes and education, this study introduces and provides validity evidence for the AI‐assisted Creativity Questionnaire (AICQ). This new 16‐item instrument aims to quantify human creative potential in AI‐assisted endeavors. Initially, a diverse cohort of 322 university students in Taiwan completed the AICQ from November to December 2023. Through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of responses from this sample, three distinct factors emerged: (1) AI‐assisted functional creativity (AIFC), (2) AI‐assisted visual artistic creativity (AIVAC), and (3) AI‐assisted ideational creativity (AIIC). One item was removed due to cross‐loading. Subsequently, in September 2024, 330 university students in Taiwan engaged with both the AICQ and the 28‐item Creative Behavior Inventory (CBI). Based on responses from this sample, construct validity evidence for the AICQ was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), which affirmed that a three‐factor model provided a good fit to the data. Gender differences in AICQ scores were found in these subsequent data. Overall, data from participants provided evidence for the reliability as well as convergent, concurrent, and discriminant validity of the scores obtained from the AICQ.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Creative Behavior
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.70004
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence Assisted Creativity: Conceptualization, Instrument Development and Validation

P.Y. Mok, Hsueh‐Hua Chuang, Ming‐Min Cheng, Thomas J. Smith
5 citations
The Journal of Creative Behavior
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
10.59
article

Artificial Intelligence Assisted Creativity: Conceptualization, Instrument Development and Validation

P.Y. Mok, Hsueh‐Hua Chuang, Ming‐Min Cheng, Thomas J. Smith
article en
5 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Considering the pivotal role of creativity across various eras and the rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in both creative processes and education, this study introduces and provides validity evidence for the AI‐assisted Creativity Questionnaire (AICQ). This new 16‐item instrument aims to quantify human creative potential in AI‐assisted endeavors. Initially, a diverse cohort of 322 university students in Taiwan completed the AICQ from November to December 2023. Through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of responses from this sample, three distinct factors emerged: (1) AI‐assisted functional creativity (AIFC), (2) AI‐assisted visual artistic creativity (AIVAC), and (3) AI‐assisted ideational creativity (AIIC). One item was removed due to cross‐loading. Subsequently, in September 2024, 330 university students in Taiwan engaged with both the AICQ and the 28‐item Creative Behavior Inventory (CBI). Based on responses from this sample, construct validity evidence for the AICQ was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), which affirmed that a three‐factor model provided a good fit to the data. Gender differences in AICQ scores were found in these subsequent data. Overall, data from participants provided evidence for the reliability as well as convergent, concurrent, and discriminant validity of the scores obtained from the AICQ.

The Journal of Creative BehaviorVol. 59(1)
Northern Illinois University (US), National Sun Yat-sen University (TW), Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
National Science and Technology Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
10.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.