Insights Into Nature‐Based Climate Solutions: Managing Forests for Climate Resilience and Carbon Stability

Abstract Successful implementation of forest management as a nature‐based climate solution is dependent on the durability of management‐induced changes in forest carbon storage and sequestration. As forests face unprecedented stability risks in the face of ongoing climate change, much remains unknown regarding how management will impact forest stability, or how interactions with climate might shift the response of forests to management across spatiotemporal scales. Here, we used a process‐based model to simulate multidecadal projections of forest dynamics in response to changes in management and climate. Simulations were conducted across gradients in forest type, edaphic factors, and management intensity under two alternate radiative forcing scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5). This allowed for the quantification of forest stability shifts in response to climate change, and the role of management in modulating that response, where ecosystem stability is characterized as the resilience and temporal stability of net primary production, aboveground biomass, and soil carbon. Our results indicate that forest structure is primarily shaped by management, but the same management strategy often produced divergent structures over time, due to interactions with regional climate change. We found that management can be used to increase stability and minimize the release of stored carbon by reducing mortality, but also highlight the regional dependency of management‐induced changes in resilience to climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jg008391
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insights Into Nature‐Based Climate Solutions: Managing Forests for Climate Resilience and Carbon Stability

Christina L. Staudhammer, Nicolena vonHedemann, Ankur R. Desai, Bailey Murphy et al.
8 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
8.84
article

Insights Into Nature‐Based Climate Solutions: Managing Forests for Climate Resilience and Carbon Stability

Christina L. Staudhammer, Nicolena vonHedemann, Ankur R. Desai, Bailey Murphy, Michael C. Dietze, Courtney A. Schultz, Christine R. Rollinson, William Kleindl
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Successful implementation of forest management as a nature‐based climate solution is dependent on the durability of management‐induced changes in forest carbon storage and sequestration. As forests face unprecedented stability risks in the face of ongoing climate change, much remains unknown regarding how management will impact forest stability, or how interactions with climate might shift the response of forests to management across spatiotemporal scales. Here, we used a process‐based model to simulate multidecadal projections of forest dynamics in response to changes in management and climate. Simulations were conducted across gradients in forest type, edaphic factors, and management intensity under two alternate radiative forcing scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5). This allowed for the quantification of forest stability shifts in response to climate change, and the role of management in modulating that response, where ecosystem stability is characterized as the resilience and temporal stability of net primary production, aboveground biomass, and soil carbon. Our results indicate that forest structure is primarily shaped by management, but the same management strategy often produced divergent structures over time, due to interactions with regional climate change. We found that management can be used to increase stability and minimize the release of stored carbon by reducing mortality, but also highlight the regional dependency of management‐induced changes in resilience to climate change.

Journal of Geophysical Research BiogeosciencesVol. 130(3)
Boston University (US), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Alabama (US), Montana State University (US), Morton Arboretum (US), Colorado State University (US)
National Science Foundation, Division of Emerging Frontiers
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
8.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.