Compressive Behaviors and Deformation Mechanisms of Open‐Cell AlSi Foam

Open‐cell AlSi foams with varying cell sizes and pore structures are fabricated using infiltration casting. Foams with uniform cell sizes ranging from 2.0 to 4.0 mm and 1.5 to 2.0 mm exhibit typical open‐cell walls. In contrast, a foam with a mixed cell size distribution (1.5 to 4.0 mm) demonstrates improved connectivity but exhibits more structural defects. Quasistatic uniaxial compression tests are performed to evaluate the compressive behavior of the foams. The deformation process and energy absorption mechanisms of three foams are comprehensively analyzed from macroscopic sample scale to pore scale using X‐ray computed tomography. The results indicate that foams with smaller cell sizes deform uniformly, with the highest compressive strength of ≈20 MPa, while those with larger cell sizes exhibit localized deformation. The foam with mixed cell sizes and a hybrid scaffold structure (3D skeletal network) displays broader deformation zones and localized deformation, rather than distinct deformation bands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Engineering Materials
Published
2025-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202402818
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cellular and Composite Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compressive Behaviors and Deformation Mechanisms of Open‐Cell AlSi Foam

Yongliang Mu, Zhaoquan Li, Yu Duan, Gaofeng Fu et al.
3 citations
Advanced Engineering Materials
Cellular and Composite Structures
2.14
article

Compressive Behaviors and Deformation Mechanisms of Open‐Cell AlSi Foam

Yongliang Mu, Zhaoquan Li, Yu Duan, Gaofeng Fu, Jing Lin, Ming Xie
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Open‐cell AlSi foams with varying cell sizes and pore structures are fabricated using infiltration casting. Foams with uniform cell sizes ranging from 2.0 to 4.0 mm and 1.5 to 2.0 mm exhibit typical open‐cell walls. In contrast, a foam with a mixed cell size distribution (1.5 to 4.0 mm) demonstrates improved connectivity but exhibits more structural defects. Quasistatic uniaxial compression tests are performed to evaluate the compressive behavior of the foams. The deformation process and energy absorption mechanisms of three foams are comprehensively analyzed from macroscopic sample scale to pore scale using X‐ray computed tomography. The results indicate that foams with smaller cell sizes deform uniformly, with the highest compressive strength of ≈20 MPa, while those with larger cell sizes exhibit localized deformation. The foam with mixed cell sizes and a hybrid scaffold structure (3D skeletal network) displays broader deformation zones and localized deformation, rather than distinct deformation bands.

Advanced Engineering MaterialsVol. 27(7)
Northeastern University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cellular and Composite Structures
2.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Compressive Behaviors and Deformation Mechanisms of Open‐Cell AlSi Foam — Yongliang Mu, Zhaoquan Li, et al. · Advanced Engineering Materials (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS