Risk Factors and Thresholds for Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Worsening after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

The rising demand for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the United States has led to high 1-year patient satisfaction rates. However, some patients experience substantial declines in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) postoperatively, which we refer to as "minimal clinically important difference for worsening" (MCID-W). We sought to define MCID-W values for specific PROMs and identify risk factors associated with PROMIS Physical Function Short Form 10a (PROMIS PF-10a) declines after UKA. We conducted a retrospective study of 760 patients undergoing UKA at our institution between 2016 and 2023. Preoperative and postoperative PROMIS PF-10a, PROMIS global physical, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score-physical function short-form (KOOS-PS) scores were collected. Patients were stratified upon reaching minimal clinically importance difference for improvement (MCID-I), MCID-W, or "no significant change" (score between MCID-W and MCID-I). MCID-W and MCID-I values were determined using a distribution-based method. Logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for scoring below MCID-W. We established the following MCID-I and MCID-W thresholds: PROMIS PF-10a (+3.00 and -1.64), KOOS-PS (+6.25 and -3.42), and PROMIS Global-Physical (+2.72 and -1.55). Bivariate analysis revealed differences in terms of revision (<i>p</i> = 0.02), reoperation (<i>p</i> = 0.03), postoperative complications (<i>p</i> = 0.002), deep venous thrombosis (DVT; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and pneumonia (<i>p</i> = 0.01) between cohorts. Body mass index >35 (odds ratio [OR] = 2.49), postoperative complications (OR = 5.09), pneumonia (OR = 22.39), DVT (OR = 9.27), and preoperative PROMIS PF-10a scores (OR = 1.07) were risk factors for scoring below the MCID-W threshold, whereas age > 80 (OR = 2.89) and preoperative PROMIS PF-10a scores (OR = 1.05) were risk factors for failing to achieve MCID-I. Our study established MCID-W values for pivotal PROMs after primary UKAs. We found that 8.8% of patients scored below MCID-W, highlighting the need to improve patient selection and perioperative care in UKA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Knee Surgery
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2555-1941
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Factors and Thresholds for Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Worsening after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Hany S. Bedair, Christopher M. Melnic, M Aguilar Gonzalez, Perry L Lim
1 citations
The Journal of Knee Surgery
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
2.01
article

Risk Factors and Thresholds for Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Worsening after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Hany S. Bedair, Christopher M. Melnic, M Aguilar Gonzalez, Perry L Lim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The rising demand for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the United States has led to high 1-year patient satisfaction rates. However, some patients experience substantial declines in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) postoperatively, which we refer to as "minimal clinically important difference for worsening" (MCID-W). We sought to define MCID-W values for specific PROMs and identify risk factors associated with PROMIS Physical Function Short Form 10a (PROMIS PF-10a) declines after UKA. We conducted a retrospective study of 760 patients undergoing UKA at our institution between 2016 and 2023. Preoperative and postoperative PROMIS PF-10a, PROMIS global physical, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score-physical function short-form (KOOS-PS) scores were collected. Patients were stratified upon reaching minimal clinically importance difference for improvement (MCID-I), MCID-W, or "no significant change" (score between MCID-W and MCID-I). MCID-W and MCID-I values were determined using a distribution-based method. Logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for scoring below MCID-W. We established the following MCID-I and MCID-W thresholds: PROMIS PF-10a (+3.00 and -1.64), KOOS-PS (+6.25 and -3.42), and PROMIS Global-Physical (+2.72 and -1.55). Bivariate analysis revealed differences in terms of revision (<i>p</i> = 0.02), reoperation (<i>p</i> = 0.03), postoperative complications (<i>p</i> = 0.002), deep venous thrombosis (DVT; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and pneumonia (<i>p</i> = 0.01) between cohorts. Body mass index >35 (odds ratio [OR] = 2.49), postoperative complications (OR = 5.09), pneumonia (OR = 22.39), DVT (OR = 9.27), and preoperative PROMIS PF-10a scores (OR = 1.07) were risk factors for scoring below the MCID-W threshold, whereas age > 80 (OR = 2.89) and preoperative PROMIS PF-10a scores (OR = 1.05) were risk factors for failing to achieve MCID-I. Our study established MCID-W values for pivotal PROMs after primary UKAs. We found that 8.8% of patients scored below MCID-W, highlighting the need to improve patient selection and perioperative care in UKA.

The Journal of Knee SurgeryVol. 38(10)
Harvard University (US), Newton Wellesley Hospital (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.