Health risks and labour supply: evidence from the <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 pandemic

Abstract This paper explores the relationship between health risks from COVID‐19 and UK labour supply, using pre‐existing conditions as a source of variation in COVID‐19 health risk. We find that those with pre‐existing conditions were less likely to work during the pandemic after controlling for a rich set of covariates, including labour supplied pre‐pandemic, but only when remote work was unavailable. This relationship begins by April 2020, persists through to September 2021, and shows signs of fading after COVID‐19 risks had fallen in 2022. Our results are strong enough to explain a 1–1.5 percentage point drop in employment during the pandemic. Placebo tests confirm that our estimates do not reflect labour demand shocks, and that a negative relationship between pre‐existing conditions and labour supplied, conditional upon the covariates, did not exist pre‐pandemic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economica
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12574
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health risks and labour supply: evidence from the COVID‐19 pandemic

Joseph Richardson
Economica
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

Health risks and labour supply: evidence from the COVID‐19 pandemic

Joseph Richardson
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the relationship between health risks from COVID‐19 and UK labour supply, using pre‐existing conditions as a source of variation in COVID‐19 health risk. We find that those with pre‐existing conditions were less likely to work during the pandemic after controlling for a rich set of covariates, including labour supplied pre‐pandemic, but only when remote work was unavailable. This relationship begins by April 2020, persists through to September 2021, and shows signs of fading after COVID‐19 risks had fallen in 2022. Our results are strong enough to explain a 1–1.5 percentage point drop in employment during the pandemic. Placebo tests confirm that our estimates do not reflect labour demand shocks, and that a negative relationship between pre‐existing conditions and labour supplied, conditional upon the covariates, did not exist pre‐pandemic.

EconomicaVol. 92(367)
Lancaster University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.