A Study on the Criticism of Han Fei Tzu's Governance Philosophy and Modern Re-examination

Han Bijia systematized Confucian thought by soberly analyzing the nature of monarchs and power. He defined human nature as an instinctive being that is not only selfish but also immutable in self-preservation. He emphasized the need for strong laws and institutions to control human nature. His philosophy of governance was based on a trinitarian structure of law, power, and strategy. He reflected the trends of the thought world at the time by emphasizing the importance of strong laws and institutions as a means of securing the monarch's power and position, and as the main solution to an effective ruling strategy. He emphasized that the rule of law, which emphasizes strong laws and institutions, is a just governing behavior based on objective standards, and he openly declared that the strong power of the ruler is the only alternative to avoid various contradictions and conflicts between humans and humans. However, his philosophy of governance only focuses on the problem of totalitarian thinking to strengthen the ruler's absolute power, and when it is supported by the ideological belief of the rule of law, the danger of serious abuse of power such as Nazism or fascism cannot be excluded. Especially under the rule of law, which is based on the decentralization of power and checks and balances, such blindness can only be devalued as a tool of anti-social indulgence that greatly undermines the value of humanity and dignity. Furthermore, his consistently pessimistic attitude toward human nature, which forced him to remain within the confines of the rule of law, and his inability to fully consider the complexity of human nature and society, certainly presents a clear limitation to his philosophy and thought. Nevertheless, Han Bijia's philosophy and ideas continue to influence many people to this day. This is because his discourse is embedded with concrete practices and strategies for structuring and implementing an ideal rule of law. This study aims to show that Han's philosophy of governance goes beyond a simple logic of power and reduces it to fair rules and practical values along with collective efficiency. In addition, we will examine in depth the limitations and contradictions of his philosophical ideas in the realm of rule of law. Through this, we hope to derive sustainable governance models and effective organizational management measures, and to provide a prospective opportunity to expand the value and scope of humanities by reaffirming the contemporary value of traditional philosophy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Barun Academy of History
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55793/jkhc.2025.24.209
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on the Criticism of Han Fei Tzu's Governance Philosophy and Modern Re-examination

Jiyoung Lee, Seohoo Son
Barun Academy of History
Chinese history and philosophy
article

A Study on the Criticism of Han Fei Tzu's Governance Philosophy and Modern Re-examination

Jiyoung Lee, Seohoo Son
article en

Abstract

Han Bijia systematized Confucian thought by soberly analyzing the nature of monarchs and power. He defined human nature as an instinctive being that is not only selfish but also immutable in self-preservation. He emphasized the need for strong laws and institutions to control human nature. His philosophy of governance was based on a trinitarian structure of law, power, and strategy. He reflected the trends of the thought world at the time by emphasizing the importance of strong laws and institutions as a means of securing the monarch's power and position, and as the main solution to an effective ruling strategy. He emphasized that the rule of law, which emphasizes strong laws and institutions, is a just governing behavior based on objective standards, and he openly declared that the strong power of the ruler is the only alternative to avoid various contradictions and conflicts between humans and humans. However, his philosophy of governance only focuses on the problem of totalitarian thinking to strengthen the ruler's absolute power, and when it is supported by the ideological belief of the rule of law, the danger of serious abuse of power such as Nazism or fascism cannot be excluded. Especially under the rule of law, which is based on the decentralization of power and checks and balances, such blindness can only be devalued as a tool of anti-social indulgence that greatly undermines the value of humanity and dignity. Furthermore, his consistently pessimistic attitude toward human nature, which forced him to remain within the confines of the rule of law, and his inability to fully consider the complexity of human nature and society, certainly presents a clear limitation to his philosophy and thought. Nevertheless, Han Bijia's philosophy and ideas continue to influence many people to this day. This is because his discourse is embedded with concrete practices and strategies for structuring and implementing an ideal rule of law. This study aims to show that Han's philosophy of governance goes beyond a simple logic of power and reduces it to fair rules and practical values along with collective efficiency. In addition, we will examine in depth the limitations and contradictions of his philosophical ideas in the realm of rule of law. Through this, we hope to derive sustainable governance models and effective organizational management measures, and to provide a prospective opportunity to expand the value and scope of humanities by reaffirming the contemporary value of traditional philosophy.

Barun Academy of HistoryVol. 24
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.