Thank You to Our 2024 Reviewers

Abstract The editorial team of AGU Advances is grateful for the excellent contributions of our peer reviewers. We rely on their expertise to ensure that the manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo a rigorous, fair, and timely review. Remarkably, during 2024, the journal benefitted from the dedication from 273 reviewers, contributing a total of 338 reviews. These reviewers represented 24 countries. These reviewers provided insights of tremendous and generous value, and they assisted our authors in strengthening the rigor, quality, and presentation of their scholarship. Peer reviewing provides a natural way to engage in continuous learning and professional development. The majority of our reviewers are geoscientists, although we also have interdisciplinary contributions as the scope of Advances covers the extended domain of geosciences, intersecting with economics, communication and computational science, and the social sciences at large. Authors benefit greatly from reviewers' comments and suggestions: already more than 10 years ago, a study reported that most authors (90%) believe that peer review improved the last paper they published (Mulligan et al., 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22798 ). Although the research and publishing arena is rapidly changing, peer review is considered the optimal standard for evaluating and selecting quality scientific manuscripts for publication, and therefore is highly deserving of our appreciation. We thank all of our peer reviewers for their selfless service and dedication to the scientific community. Your continuing support to the authors and editorial team of AGU Advances is deeply appreciated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AGU Advances
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025av001711
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thank You to Our 2024 Reviewers

Eric A. Davidson, Donald J. Wuebbles, Alberto Montanari, Susan Trumbore et al.
AGU Advances
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Thank You to Our 2024 Reviewers

Eric A. Davidson, Donald J. Wuebbles, Alberto Montanari, Susan Trumbore, Tissa H. Illangasekare, Thomas F. Stocker, Marcos Moreno, Nicolas Gruber, M. K. Hudson, Hang Su, T. W. Becker, Ana P. Barros, L. J. Paxton, Binzheng Zhang, Björn Stevens, M. Bayani Cardenas, Peter K. Zeitler, Vincent J. M. Salters, David Schimel, Eileen E. Hofmann, Jessica E. Tierney, Sharon Billings, Marc F. P. Bierkens, F. Nimmo, Sarah M. Kang, François Primeau, Xi Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract The editorial team of AGU Advances is grateful for the excellent contributions of our peer reviewers. We rely on their expertise to ensure that the manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo a rigorous, fair, and timely review. Remarkably, during 2024, the journal benefitted from the dedication from 273 reviewers, contributing a total of 338 reviews. These reviewers represented 24 countries. These reviewers provided insights of tremendous and generous value, and they assisted our authors in strengthening the rigor, quality, and presentation of their scholarship. Peer reviewing provides a natural way to engage in continuous learning and professional development. The majority of our reviewers are geoscientists, although we also have interdisciplinary contributions as the scope of Advances covers the extended domain of geosciences, intersecting with economics, communication and computational science, and the social sciences at large. Authors benefit greatly from reviewers' comments and suggestions: already more than 10 years ago, a study reported that most authors (90%) believe that peer review improved the last paper they published (Mulligan et al., 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22798 ). Although the research and publishing arena is rapidly changing, peer review is considered the optimal standard for evaluating and selecting quality scientific manuscripts for publication, and therefore is highly deserving of our appreciation. We thank all of our peer reviewers for their selfless service and dedication to the scientific community. Your continuing support to the authors and editorial team of AGU Advances is deeply appreciated.

AGU AdvancesVol. 6(2)
Florida State University (US), Dartmouth College (US), University of Bern (CH), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), University of Arizona (US), University of Kansas (US), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Colorado School of Mines (US), University of California, Santa Cruz (US), Lehigh University (US), Utrecht University (NL), University of California, Irvine (US), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US), ETH Zurich (CH), Max Planck Institute for Chemistry (DE), Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (DE), Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (DE), Old Dominion University (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), University of Hong Kong (HK), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.