Health inequality attributions and support for healthcare policy

This article examines popular explanations of health inequality and introduces a typology distinguishing between behavioural, biological, environmental, and healthcare attributions. Using data from an original survey among 6000 individuals in Germany, the findings reveal that explanations for the social gradient in health vary by income and political ideology. Lower-income groups primarily attribute health inequality to the healthcare system, whereas higher-income groups attribute them to behavioural factors. Similarly, right-wing individuals tend to view income-related health disparities as a consequence of individual behaviour, while left-wing individuals primarily attribute them to environmental health risks. Furthermore, the study shows that such health inequality attributions are associated with citizens' support for government responsibility for healthcare provision and willingness to pay higher taxes to improve healthcare. These findings suggest that health inequality attributions play an important role in the democratic legitimacy of healthcare policies. Divergent views on the causes of health disparities may undermine solidarity within healthcare systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117946
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health inequality attributions and support for healthcare policy

Sharon Baute
3 citations
Social Science & Medicine
Health disparities and outcomes
6.50
article

Health inequality attributions and support for healthcare policy

Sharon Baute
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article examines popular explanations of health inequality and introduces a typology distinguishing between behavioural, biological, environmental, and healthcare attributions. Using data from an original survey among 6000 individuals in Germany, the findings reveal that explanations for the social gradient in health vary by income and political ideology. Lower-income groups primarily attribute health inequality to the healthcare system, whereas higher-income groups attribute them to behavioural factors. Similarly, right-wing individuals tend to view income-related health disparities as a consequence of individual behaviour, while left-wing individuals primarily attribute them to environmental health risks. Furthermore, the study shows that such health inequality attributions are associated with citizens' support for government responsibility for healthcare provision and willingness to pay higher taxes to improve healthcare. These findings suggest that health inequality attributions play an important role in the democratic legitimacy of healthcare policies. Divergent views on the causes of health disparities may undermine solidarity within healthcare systems.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 374
University of Konstanz (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Health disparities and outcomes
6.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.