Paying social costs to gain discounts: Is it beneficial for you?

We study two prevalent business strategies: collective buying and referral reward strategies, leveraging social interactions among consumers to incentivize purchases through discounts or rewards. Consumers exhibit heterogeneity in their awareness of the product. Aware consumers pursue discounts or rewards by inviting their peers, which can increase the unaware peers’ valuation of this product. In the collective buying strategy, the retailer determines both individual purchase prices and collective buying discounts. Consumers have the option to make individual purchases or form groups. The final demand is contingent on the equilibrium of a Nash game, in which consumers form groups through invitations. In equilibrium, the optimal collective buying strategy proves to be more profitable than the posted price strategy (where consumers can only purchase individually) when the social cost of inviting is moderate, the fraction of aware consumers is not overly large, and the additional value is not negligible. Notably, the lowest collective buying discount arises when the social cost, the fraction of aware consumers, and the additional value are all at moderate levels. In the referral reward strategy, the retailer determines both individual purchase prices and rewards for successful recommendations. We derive the optimal referral reward strategy and further scrutinize the optimal retail strategy by comparing the posted price strategy, collective buying strategy, and referral reward strategy. Our comprehensive analysis reveals non-monotonic shifts in the optimal retail strategy as various parameters change, some of which appear to be novel and unreported in the existing literature. Finally, we extend our collective-buying model to address scenarios where the social cost and consumers’ valuations are continuous. • We investigate the optimal design of the collective buying and referral reward strategies, and compare them with the traditional posted pricing strategy, respectively. • We show that the optimal collective-buying discount exhibits a non-monotonic relationship with the social cost/additional valuation/the fraction of aware consumers. • We examine which strategy—collective buying, referral rewards, or posted pricing—is the most profitable for the retailer across various model parameters. • We find that the retailer should adopt collective buying when the fraction of aware consumers is small and switch to referral rewards when it is moderate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Omega
Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2025.103307
Primary Topic
Taxation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paying social costs to gain discounts: Is it beneficial for you?

Jinxing Xie, Wanshan Zhu, Dong Liang, Xiaobo Zhao et al.
Omega
Taxation and Compliance Studies
article

Paying social costs to gain discounts: Is it beneficial for you?

Jinxing Xie, Wanshan Zhu, Dong Liang, Xiaobo Zhao, Shuyuan Zhu
article en

Abstract

We study two prevalent business strategies: collective buying and referral reward strategies, leveraging social interactions among consumers to incentivize purchases through discounts or rewards. Consumers exhibit heterogeneity in their awareness of the product. Aware consumers pursue discounts or rewards by inviting their peers, which can increase the unaware peers’ valuation of this product. In the collective buying strategy, the retailer determines both individual purchase prices and collective buying discounts. Consumers have the option to make individual purchases or form groups. The final demand is contingent on the equilibrium of a Nash game, in which consumers form groups through invitations. In equilibrium, the optimal collective buying strategy proves to be more profitable than the posted price strategy (where consumers can only purchase individually) when the social cost of inviting is moderate, the fraction of aware consumers is not overly large, and the additional value is not negligible. Notably, the lowest collective buying discount arises when the social cost, the fraction of aware consumers, and the additional value are all at moderate levels. In the referral reward strategy, the retailer determines both individual purchase prices and rewards for successful recommendations. We derive the optimal referral reward strategy and further scrutinize the optimal retail strategy by comparing the posted price strategy, collective buying strategy, and referral reward strategy. Our comprehensive analysis reveals non-monotonic shifts in the optimal retail strategy as various parameters change, some of which appear to be novel and unreported in the existing literature. Finally, we extend our collective-buying model to address scenarios where the social cost and consumers’ valuations are continuous. • We investigate the optimal design of the collective buying and referral reward strategies, and compare them with the traditional posted pricing strategy, respectively. • We show that the optimal collective-buying discount exhibits a non-monotonic relationship with the social cost/additional valuation/the fraction of aware consumers. • We examine which strategy—collective buying, referral rewards, or posted pricing—is the most profitable for the retailer across various model parameters. • We find that the retailer should adopt collective buying when the fraction of aware consumers is small and switch to referral rewards when it is moderate.

OmegaVol. 135
National University of Defense Technology (CN), Renmin University of China (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Taxation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.