A service evaluation following the implementation of computer guided consultation software to support primary care reviews for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
This study evaluates the impact of using a Clinical Decision Support System software in the form of a computer-guided consultation (CGC) when conducting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) reviews in primary care. 5221 patients on the COPD register underwent CGC review with 21.1% found not to have COPD. Previously unrecognised cardiac disease was highlighted by the CGC in 7% of confirmed COPD cases. CGC review resulted in the number of patients possessing a self-management plan rising from 62-85%. 13% were found to have sub-optimal inhaler technique during CGC review with the CGC prompting correction in all cases. Only 26% of patients identified by the CGC as appropriate for Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) referral had previously attended a PR program. The integration of technology in the form of clinical decision support system software results in greater implementation of guideline-level care representing a scalable solution when performing COPD reviews.
Authors
- J.D. Richards
- Robert Angus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5987-5598)
- L. N. Dowie
- M Pearson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8161-2660)
- Eddie McKnight
- Molly L. Osborne
- Christopher B. Cooper (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6314-0903)
- Biswajit Chakrabarti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0433-1785)
- M. Choudhury-Iqbal
- Robb Malone
- Lisa Davies
Institutions
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Chiesi (United Kingdom) (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
- Published
- 2025-03-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-025-00421-1
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.52