Residential Exterior Wall Reaction to Post‐Flashover Compartment Fires

ABSTRACT Large outdoor fires involving building‐to‐building fire spread are catastrophic, often resulting in significant loss of life and property. Previous research investigating ignition of buildings from exterior fires has focused on exposures from wildland fuels, which typically have shorter residence times compared to structure fires. This paper presents the details of full‐scale building‐to‐building fire spread experiments conducted on residential exterior wall assemblies. Three wall assemblies sided with exterior plywood panels (hereafter referred to as T1–11), exterior insulation finishing system (EIFS), and fiber cement board were exposed to a post‐flashover compartment fire at 1.8, 3.0, and 4.3 m separation distances to evaluate reaction‐to‐fire characteristics. All three wall assemblies tested ignited from the source exposure within this range of separation distances, which are common in residential areas with high structure density. Combustible siding (T1–11 and EIFS) ignited at the 3.0 and 4.3 m separation distances, whereas sheathing behind the noncombustible siding (fiber cement) wall assembly ignited at the 1.8 m separation distance. Compared to results from experiments with an identical protocol that examined the performance of double‐pane window assemblies, the maximum heat load (time‐integrated heat flux) at the time of ignition at the 3.0 m separation distance was consistently higher than the heat load at the time of cracking of the outer pane of plain (annealed) glass window assemblies but lower than that for cracking of both panes of a double‐pane window assembly. Current codes, standards, and test methods should address fire penetration, as well as vertical and lateral flame propagation of exterior wall assemblies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Fire and Materials
Published
2025-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.3278
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Fire dynamics and safety research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Residential Exterior Wall Reaction to Post‐Flashover Compartment Fires

Joseph M. Willi, Daniel J. Gorham, Gavin P. Horn
3 citations
Fire and Materials
Fire dynamics and safety research
3.91
article

Residential Exterior Wall Reaction to Post‐Flashover Compartment Fires

Joseph M. Willi, Daniel J. Gorham, Gavin P. Horn
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Large outdoor fires involving building‐to‐building fire spread are catastrophic, often resulting in significant loss of life and property. Previous research investigating ignition of buildings from exterior fires has focused on exposures from wildland fuels, which typically have shorter residence times compared to structure fires. This paper presents the details of full‐scale building‐to‐building fire spread experiments conducted on residential exterior wall assemblies. Three wall assemblies sided with exterior plywood panels (hereafter referred to as T1–11), exterior insulation finishing system (EIFS), and fiber cement board were exposed to a post‐flashover compartment fire at 1.8, 3.0, and 4.3 m separation distances to evaluate reaction‐to‐fire characteristics. All three wall assemblies tested ignited from the source exposure within this range of separation distances, which are common in residential areas with high structure density. Combustible siding (T1–11 and EIFS) ignited at the 3.0 and 4.3 m separation distances, whereas sheathing behind the noncombustible siding (fiber cement) wall assembly ignited at the 1.8 m separation distance. Compared to results from experiments with an identical protocol that examined the performance of double‐pane window assemblies, the maximum heat load (time‐integrated heat flux) at the time of ignition at the 3.0 m separation distance was consistently higher than the heat load at the time of cracking of the outer pane of plain (annealed) glass window assemblies but lower than that for cracking of both panes of a double‐pane window assembly. Current codes, standards, and test methods should address fire penetration, as well as vertical and lateral flame propagation of exterior wall assemblies.

Fire and MaterialsVol. 49(5)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Fire dynamics and safety research
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.