Drivers of Vegetation Structure Differ Between Proposed Natural Reference Conditions for Temperate Europe

ABSTRACT Aim Pre‐degradation baseline conditions (references) provide crucial context for restoration actions. Here, we compare vegetation structure and its driving processes across the main pre‐agricultural references discussed for temperate Europe: the Last Interglacial and the early‐mid Holocene—before and after the arrival of Homo sapiens , respectively. Location Temperate Europe. Time Period The first ~4000–6000 years, excluding the initial early‐successional phases, of the Last Interglacial (PAAZ III) and Holocene (8700–5700 BP). Major Taxa Studied Plants. Methods We use large datasets of pollen‐based vegetation reconstructions (REVEALS) to compare open vegetation, light woodland and closed forest between the two periods. We use Random Forest modelling and downscaled climate data to assess whether climate‐vegetation relations were consistent between periods, as expected if they reflected direct climatic effects on vegetation. Results Open vegetation was slightly higher in the early–mid Holocene than in the Last Interglacial, averaging 20% versus 16% in paired grid cells, respectively. In contrast, light woodland cover was lower in the early–mid Holocene, with mean values of 49% compared to 57% in paired cells. The combined open vegetation and light woodland cover was high in both periods, averaging 73% in the Last Interglacial and 69% in the early–mid Holocene. Closed forest cover was similar across both periods (Holocene = 24%; Last Interglacial = 23%). Notably, openness –climate relations from the early–mid Holocene cannot predict open vegetation in the Last Interglacial. Main Conclusions These findings suggest that vegetation in the early–mid Holocene and Last Interglacial was affected by persistent, substantial disturbances, which were not controlled by direct climate effects, and that the main drivers differed between the periods, with the rich megafauna of the Last Interglacial and Mesolithic people as the primary candidates. Our findings support that early–mid Holocene ecosystems were already strongly shaped by Homo sapiens and differed from earlier temperate ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70020
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drivers of Vegetation Structure Differ Between Proposed Natural Reference Conditions for Temperate Europe

Florence Mazier, Maria Antonia Serge, Elena A. Pearce, Signe Normand et al.
8 citations
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
10.41
article

Drivers of Vegetation Structure Differ Between Proposed Natural Reference Conditions for Temperate Europe

Florence Mazier, Maria Antonia Serge, Elena A. Pearce, Signe Normand, Paolo Scussolini, Charles Davison, Jens‐Christian Svenning, Ralph Fyfe
article en
8 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim Pre‐degradation baseline conditions (references) provide crucial context for restoration actions. Here, we compare vegetation structure and its driving processes across the main pre‐agricultural references discussed for temperate Europe: the Last Interglacial and the early‐mid Holocene—before and after the arrival of Homo sapiens , respectively. Location Temperate Europe. Time Period The first ~4000–6000 years, excluding the initial early‐successional phases, of the Last Interglacial (PAAZ III) and Holocene (8700–5700 BP). Major Taxa Studied Plants. Methods We use large datasets of pollen‐based vegetation reconstructions (REVEALS) to compare open vegetation, light woodland and closed forest between the two periods. We use Random Forest modelling and downscaled climate data to assess whether climate‐vegetation relations were consistent between periods, as expected if they reflected direct climatic effects on vegetation. Results Open vegetation was slightly higher in the early–mid Holocene than in the Last Interglacial, averaging 20% versus 16% in paired grid cells, respectively. In contrast, light woodland cover was lower in the early–mid Holocene, with mean values of 49% compared to 57% in paired cells. The combined open vegetation and light woodland cover was high in both periods, averaging 73% in the Last Interglacial and 69% in the early–mid Holocene. Closed forest cover was similar across both periods (Holocene = 24%; Last Interglacial = 23%). Notably, openness –climate relations from the early–mid Holocene cannot predict open vegetation in the Last Interglacial. Main Conclusions These findings suggest that vegetation in the early–mid Holocene and Last Interglacial was affected by persistent, substantial disturbances, which were not controlled by direct climate effects, and that the main drivers differed between the periods, with the rich megafauna of the Last Interglacial and Mesolithic people as the primary candidates. Our findings support that early–mid Holocene ecosystems were already strongly shaped by Homo sapiens and differed from earlier temperate ecosystems.

Global Ecology and BiogeographyVol. 34(3)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Aarhus University (DK), Sustainable Innovation (Sweden) (SE), Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (FR), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Plymouth (GB)
Villum Fonden, European Commission, National Research Foundation, Danmarks Grundforskningsfond, Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
10.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.