A comparative fractographic analysis for the effect of polymeric nanofiber reinforcements on the tensile behavior of multi‐layered epoxy nanocomposites

Abstract This study presents a comparative investigation into the effects of four different nanofibers—PA66, PStX, PAN, and PVB—on the mechanical performance and failure mechanisms of epoxy adhesive films. These nanofiber‐reinforced adhesive layers were manufactured via a dry‐reinforcement resin film infusion method and tested under uniaxial tensile loading. Mechanical results showed that PA66 and PStX nanofibers improved tensile strength by up to 25%, primarily by mitigating crack initiation at free edges and promoting effective fiber–matrix bonding. In contrast, PAN nanofibers induced micro‐cracks at the fiber–resin interface, amplifying crack coalescence and reducing strength by 25%. PVB nanofibers, which lost their fibrous morphology due to a relatively low glass transition temperature, formed a separate polymeric phase with a negligible reinforcement effect. Detailed fractographic analyses identified key features—ratchet marks, ridges, interlayer failures, and river lines—that elucidate how nanofiber type, compatibility with the epoxy matrix, and cure conditions dictate the final failure modes. A “top‐down” approach to fractography revealed that manufacturing‐induced free‐edge cracks and nanofiber‐based interactions converge to influence the ultimate tensile performance of these adhesive films. Finally, a fishbone diagram synthesizes the findings, offering a practical reference for the effects of fiber selection, processing parameters, and testing protocols in developing high‐performance, nanofiber‐reinforced epoxy adhesive films. Highlights Tensile failure mechanisms for novel laminated nanofiber/epoxy nanocomposites. Effect of nanofiber base polymer choice on mechanical response of epoxy adhesive films. Multi‐scaled perspective for efficient fractographic analysis. A top to bottom approach on failure analysis of nanocomposites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer Engineering and Science
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.27150
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative fractographic analysis for the effect of polymeric nanofiber reinforcements on the tensile behavior of multi‐layered epoxy nanocomposites

Melih Papila, Kaan Bilge, Farzin Javanshour, Abdul Bari Abdul Raheman
5 citations
Polymer Engineering and Science
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
4.32
article

A comparative fractographic analysis for the effect of polymeric nanofiber reinforcements on the tensile behavior of multi‐layered epoxy nanocomposites

Melih Papila, Kaan Bilge, Farzin Javanshour, Abdul Bari Abdul Raheman
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study presents a comparative investigation into the effects of four different nanofibers—PA66, PStX, PAN, and PVB—on the mechanical performance and failure mechanisms of epoxy adhesive films. These nanofiber‐reinforced adhesive layers were manufactured via a dry‐reinforcement resin film infusion method and tested under uniaxial tensile loading. Mechanical results showed that PA66 and PStX nanofibers improved tensile strength by up to 25%, primarily by mitigating crack initiation at free edges and promoting effective fiber–matrix bonding. In contrast, PAN nanofibers induced micro‐cracks at the fiber–resin interface, amplifying crack coalescence and reducing strength by 25%. PVB nanofibers, which lost their fibrous morphology due to a relatively low glass transition temperature, formed a separate polymeric phase with a negligible reinforcement effect. Detailed fractographic analyses identified key features—ratchet marks, ridges, interlayer failures, and river lines—that elucidate how nanofiber type, compatibility with the epoxy matrix, and cure conditions dictate the final failure modes. A “top‐down” approach to fractography revealed that manufacturing‐induced free‐edge cracks and nanofiber‐based interactions converge to influence the ultimate tensile performance of these adhesive films. Finally, a fishbone diagram synthesizes the findings, offering a practical reference for the effects of fiber selection, processing parameters, and testing protocols in developing high‐performance, nanofiber‐reinforced epoxy adhesive films. Highlights Tensile failure mechanisms for novel laminated nanofiber/epoxy nanocomposites. Effect of nanofiber base polymer choice on mechanical response of epoxy adhesive films. Multi‐scaled perspective for efficient fractographic analysis. A top to bottom approach on failure analysis of nanocomposites.

Polymer Engineering and ScienceVol. 65(5)
Sabancı Üniversitesi (TR), California State University, Northridge (US), VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
4.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.