Toward More Scalable Processes for Perovskite Solar Cells: A Comparison Between Planar and Mesoporous Architectures

ABSTRACT Developing perovskite solar cells (PSCs) under ambient conditions remains challenging due to the material's sensitivity to oxygen and moisture. This study presents two types of PSCs fabricated entirely under ambient atmospheric conditions using different deposition techniques: spin coating and drop casting. Spin‐coated cells were produced with a compact planar structure (C‐PSC), while drop‐cast cells utilized a mesoporous architecture (M‐PSC), which not only lowers manufacturing costs but also reduces the environmental impact by limiting perovskite exposure to air during processing. Both architectures employed a CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 perovskite layer, stabilized with either chloride anion (Cl − ) or ammonium valeric acid cation (AVA + ) additives to enhance film stability. The maturation process of fresh cells was also investigated, revealing that M‐PSC devices benefited from increased photovoltaic activity postmaturation. Functional cells were achieved, with the C‐PSC_Cl devices reaching nearly 13% power conversion efficiency (PCE) and M‐PSC_AVAI_m devices attaining a PCE of 10.7%. The M‐PSCs also showed larger active areas and more consistent performance, underscoring their reproducibility and suitability for scaling. This study provides valuable insights into cost‐effective and environmentally sustainable fabrication methods for PSCs, offering promising pathways for the large‐scale manufacturing and deployment of PSC technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nano Select
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nano.202400205
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Perovskite Materials and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward More Scalable Processes for Perovskite Solar Cells: A Comparison Between Planar and Mesoporous Architectures

M. Bernechea, Lara Perrin, Lionel Flandin, Émilie Planès et al.
3 citations
Nano Select
Perovskite Materials and Applications
2.19
article

Toward More Scalable Processes for Perovskite Solar Cells: A Comparison Between Planar and Mesoporous Architectures

M. Bernechea, Lara Perrin, Lionel Flandin, Émilie Planès, Fatou Diaw Ndiaye
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Developing perovskite solar cells (PSCs) under ambient conditions remains challenging due to the material's sensitivity to oxygen and moisture. This study presents two types of PSCs fabricated entirely under ambient atmospheric conditions using different deposition techniques: spin coating and drop casting. Spin‐coated cells were produced with a compact planar structure (C‐PSC), while drop‐cast cells utilized a mesoporous architecture (M‐PSC), which not only lowers manufacturing costs but also reduces the environmental impact by limiting perovskite exposure to air during processing. Both architectures employed a CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 perovskite layer, stabilized with either chloride anion (Cl − ) or ammonium valeric acid cation (AVA + ) additives to enhance film stability. The maturation process of fresh cells was also investigated, revealing that M‐PSC devices benefited from increased photovoltaic activity postmaturation. Functional cells were achieved, with the C‐PSC_Cl devices reaching nearly 13% power conversion efficiency (PCE) and M‐PSC_AVAI_m devices attaining a PCE of 10.7%. The M‐PSCs also showed larger active areas and more consistent performance, underscoring their reproducibility and suitability for scaling. This study provides valuable insights into cost‐effective and environmentally sustainable fabrication methods for PSCs, offering promising pathways for the large‐scale manufacturing and deployment of PSC technologies.

Nano SelectVol. 6(5)
Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Fundacion Agencia Aragonesa para la Investigacion y el Desarrollo (ES), Biomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (ES), Instituto de Nanociencia y Materiales de Aragón (ES), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, Universidad de Zaragoza, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Perovskite Materials and Applications
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.