Raising educational outcomes for individuals with Down syndrome: Findings from a larger systematic review of targeted interventions for individuals with SEND

Abstract No previous systematic reviews have focused on which targeted interventions successfully raise educational outcomes (i.e. reading, writing, mathematics, science and general attainment outcomes) for students with Down syndrome. This study reports on the findings from a larger pre‐registered systematic review of targeted interventions for students with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Here, we examined studies that have used a randomised controlled trial (RCT) or quasi‐experimental design (QED) to evaluate a targeted intervention for students with Down syndrome to establish evidence of positive outcomes and to identify any research gaps. Six studies were identified. Four of these focused on interventions designed to improve reading abilities, and two focused on improving mathematical outcomes. Some positive outcomes were reported, despite the studies using small sample sizes and reporting on interventions that were implemented for less than one school term. This study highlights that individualised programmes delivered by an adult rather than by computer provide the most likely success for raising educational outcomes in students with Down syndrome. However, there are few RCT and QED studies that have evaluated what interventions can be beneficial for this population. The implications of these results and directions for future research are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.70004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Raising educational outcomes for individuals with Down syndrome: Findings from a larger systematic review of targeted interventions for individuals with SEND

Julie Dockrell, Jo Van Herwegen, Rebecca Gordon, Michael S. C. Thomas et al.
1 citations
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
1.88
article

Raising educational outcomes for individuals with Down syndrome: Findings from a larger systematic review of targeted interventions for individuals with SEND

Julie Dockrell, Jo Van Herwegen, Rebecca Gordon, Michael S. C. Thomas, Chloë Marshall, Thomas Masterman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract No previous systematic reviews have focused on which targeted interventions successfully raise educational outcomes (i.e. reading, writing, mathematics, science and general attainment outcomes) for students with Down syndrome. This study reports on the findings from a larger pre‐registered systematic review of targeted interventions for students with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Here, we examined studies that have used a randomised controlled trial (RCT) or quasi‐experimental design (QED) to evaluate a targeted intervention for students with Down syndrome to establish evidence of positive outcomes and to identify any research gaps. Six studies were identified. Four of these focused on interventions designed to improve reading abilities, and two focused on improving mathematical outcomes. Some positive outcomes were reported, despite the studies using small sample sizes and reporting on interventions that were implemented for less than one school term. This study highlights that individualised programmes delivered by an adult rather than by computer provide the most likely success for raising educational outcomes in students with Down syndrome. However, there are few RCT and QED studies that have evaluated what interventions can be beneficial for this population. The implications of these results and directions for future research are discussed.

Journal of Research in Special Educational NeedsVol. 25(4)
University of London (GB), Faculty (United Kingdom) (GB), University College London (GB), Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Nuffield Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.