Morality and Diachronic Choice

ABSTRACT The guiding aim of this piece is to illuminate the topic of morality and diachronic choice by revealing its connections to two closely related topics that have received significantly more attention in philosophy, namely that of morality and collective action problems and that of rationality and diachronic choice . A further, related aim is to chime in on a key point of contention relevant to debates on morality and diachronic choice that centers around the marginalized but, in my view, compelling idea that appropriate diachronic choice can involve passing up a preferable option. Ultimately, I will suggest that, although the idea is initially counterintuitive, it is philosophically powerful and very much worthy of continued investigation. Relatedly, I will consider the possibility of preferability cycles —which can, if they exist, make sense of passing up a preferable option—and suggest that there remain reasons for pause in relation to the widespread rejection of such cycles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy Compass
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.70027
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Morality and Diachronic Choice

Chrisoula Andreou
Philosophy Compass
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Morality and Diachronic Choice

Chrisoula Andreou
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The guiding aim of this piece is to illuminate the topic of morality and diachronic choice by revealing its connections to two closely related topics that have received significantly more attention in philosophy, namely that of morality and collective action problems and that of rationality and diachronic choice . A further, related aim is to chime in on a key point of contention relevant to debates on morality and diachronic choice that centers around the marginalized but, in my view, compelling idea that appropriate diachronic choice can involve passing up a preferable option. Ultimately, I will suggest that, although the idea is initially counterintuitive, it is philosophically powerful and very much worthy of continued investigation. Relatedly, I will consider the possibility of preferability cycles —which can, if they exist, make sense of passing up a preferable option—and suggest that there remain reasons for pause in relation to the widespread rejection of such cycles.

Philosophy CompassVol. 20(3)
University of Utah (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.