Analyzing Pragmatic Strategies and Metaphorical Devices in Presidential Speeches

The current study undertakes an analysis of the role played by rhetorical strategies, Grice's "Cooperative Principle" (CP) (1975), and Bitzer's "Rhetorical Situation" (RS) model (1968) in strengthening the use of metaphorical devices in presidential addresses. The general issue under consideration is the lack of in-depth analysis concerning the manner in which such strategies and theoretical frameworks enrich the effectiveness of metaphorical device use in political rhetoric. Overall, the purpose of this study is to map out metaphorical device use in presidential speeches according to Grice’s maxims and Bitzer’s dimensions in terms of direction and manner in which effectiveness and metaphor use merge in such discourses. The study hypothesizes that: 1) Effect creation in metaphorical device use is supported through deliberate flouting and transgression of Grice’s maxims; 2) Influence is actualized through metaphorical device use in taking a stance with and opposing supportive, hostile forces, and societal issues; 3) Grice’s CP and Bitzer’s RS models serve to promote efficacy in metaphorical device use in political narrative creation. The following research questions include: In what manner and to what level do rhetoric strategies, Grice’s CP, and Bitzer’s model enable use and effectiveness of metaphorical devices in presidential addresses? How do such factors work cooperatively in shaping effectiveness and persuasiveness? In what manner and in what direction do metaphors contribute to strengthening and undermining political ideology? The dataset consists of 20 excerpts of presidential addresses delivered at important events, such as inaugurations and concurrent congressional sessions, to a general populace that involves political leaders, policymakers, and citizens worldwide. Adopting a mixed-methods analysis, the study is focused on language, rhetoric, and metaphor, specifically in terms of Grice’s maxims and Bitzer’s model of rhetoric, with a view towards improving metaphorical speech delivery in political discourse. Building political rhetoric is also clarified through a discussion of rhetorical techniques, pragmatic structures, and metaphorical tools, in addition to an investigation of their interdependencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
مداد الآداب
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58564/ma.v15i38.1762
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing Pragmatic Strategies and Metaphorical Devices in Presidential Speeches

Dr.Mahmoud Arif Edan, Prof. Dr. Bushra Ni’ma Rashid
مداد الآداب
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

Analyzing Pragmatic Strategies and Metaphorical Devices in Presidential Speeches

Dr.Mahmoud Arif Edan, Prof. Dr. Bushra Ni’ma Rashid
article en

Abstract

The current study undertakes an analysis of the role played by rhetorical strategies, Grice's "Cooperative Principle" (CP) (1975), and Bitzer's "Rhetorical Situation" (RS) model (1968) in strengthening the use of metaphorical devices in presidential addresses. The general issue under consideration is the lack of in-depth analysis concerning the manner in which such strategies and theoretical frameworks enrich the effectiveness of metaphorical device use in political rhetoric. Overall, the purpose of this study is to map out metaphorical device use in presidential speeches according to Grice’s maxims and Bitzer’s dimensions in terms of direction and manner in which effectiveness and metaphor use merge in such discourses. The study hypothesizes that: 1) Effect creation in metaphorical device use is supported through deliberate flouting and transgression of Grice’s maxims; 2) Influence is actualized through metaphorical device use in taking a stance with and opposing supportive, hostile forces, and societal issues; 3) Grice’s CP and Bitzer’s RS models serve to promote efficacy in metaphorical device use in political narrative creation. The following research questions include: In what manner and to what level do rhetoric strategies, Grice’s CP, and Bitzer’s model enable use and effectiveness of metaphorical devices in presidential addresses? How do such factors work cooperatively in shaping effectiveness and persuasiveness? In what manner and in what direction do metaphors contribute to strengthening and undermining political ideology? The dataset consists of 20 excerpts of presidential addresses delivered at important events, such as inaugurations and concurrent congressional sessions, to a general populace that involves political leaders, policymakers, and citizens worldwide. Adopting a mixed-methods analysis, the study is focused on language, rhetoric, and metaphor, specifically in terms of Grice’s maxims and Bitzer’s model of rhetoric, with a view towards improving metaphorical speech delivery in political discourse. Building political rhetoric is also clarified through a discussion of rhetorical techniques, pragmatic structures, and metaphorical tools, in addition to an investigation of their interdependencies.

مداد الآدابVol. 15(38)
Iraqi University (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.