The multifaceted spectra of power − A participatory network analysis on power structures in diverse dryland regions

• Bringing three empirical cases to the study of conflict and collaboration. • Contributing to the theoretical literature on sources of power by pushing the state of the art on environmental change politics. • Filling research gap by focusing on traditionally neglected actors levels of power in formal and informal network settings. • Innovative methodological approach through emphasizing qualitative social network analysis whilst emphasizing co-production of knowledge. With intensifying climate change impacts on dryland regions, it is essential to better understand how actors relate to each other to sustainably manage natural resources. The literature on environmental governance networks has studied actor collaborations, but it is only starting to investigate networks that sustain conflictive situations. Moreover, while actors traditionally defined as powerful have received important scholarly attention, those who do not hold formal authority or key financial resources have not, as well as their sources of power. In this paper we analyse Net-Map data to better understand the sources of power of actor groups that traditionally are not perceived as influential, hence they are neglected in actor networks. We use social network analysis and a typology of power to understand these actors’ links in the networks, aiming to decipher what might explain why the traditionally neglected actors are perceived as particularly influential. We apply these methods to local sites in three case countries, all located in dryland regions. Net-Map workshops with diverse groups of participants were held with a focus on agricultural production systems. The results reveal that a broad variety of actors that traditionally have been, and still are, neglected in decision making domains, are perceived as particularly influential in their regions, pointing to the various modes in which power is understood and exercised. The competing interests over natural resources shed light on the role that conflictive tensions played in power relations. Through this work a broader understanding of power asymmetries in actor networks is gained.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Environmental Change
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.102984
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The multifaceted spectra of power − A participatory network analysis on power structures in diverse dryland regions

Ana Paula Aguiar, Veronica Olofsson, Antonio Arjona Castro, Amanda Jiménez-Aceituno et al.
2 citations
Global Environmental Change
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
9.66
article

The multifaceted spectra of power − A participatory network analysis on power structures in diverse dryland regions

Ana Paula Aguiar, Veronica Olofsson, Antonio Arjona Castro, Amanda Jiménez-Aceituno, María D. López‐Rodríguez, María Mancilla García, Amanda Sousa Silvino, Sofía Cortés Calderón, Amadou Hamath Diallo, Taís Gonzalez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Bringing three empirical cases to the study of conflict and collaboration. • Contributing to the theoretical literature on sources of power by pushing the state of the art on environmental change politics. • Filling research gap by focusing on traditionally neglected actors levels of power in formal and informal network settings. • Innovative methodological approach through emphasizing qualitative social network analysis whilst emphasizing co-production of knowledge. With intensifying climate change impacts on dryland regions, it is essential to better understand how actors relate to each other to sustainably manage natural resources. The literature on environmental governance networks has studied actor collaborations, but it is only starting to investigate networks that sustain conflictive situations. Moreover, while actors traditionally defined as powerful have received important scholarly attention, those who do not hold formal authority or key financial resources have not, as well as their sources of power. In this paper we analyse Net-Map data to better understand the sources of power of actor groups that traditionally are not perceived as influential, hence they are neglected in actor networks. We use social network analysis and a typology of power to understand these actors’ links in the networks, aiming to decipher what might explain why the traditionally neglected actors are perceived as particularly influential. We apply these methods to local sites in three case countries, all located in dryland regions. Net-Map workshops with diverse groups of participants were held with a focus on agricultural production systems. The results reveal that a broad variety of actors that traditionally have been, and still are, neglected in decision making domains, are perceived as particularly influential in their regions, pointing to the various modes in which power is understood and exercised. The competing interests over natural resources shed light on the role that conflictive tensions played in power relations. Through this work a broader understanding of power asymmetries in actor networks is gained.

Global Environmental ChangeVol. 92
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE), Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE), Stockholm University (SE), University of Almería (ES), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR), International University (KH)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
9.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.