From Territorial Consolidation to Bureaucratic Dominance: The Long Arc of State Development

Our understanding of state development—a term that encompasses both state formation and state building—has grown significantly in the last two decades. In this review, I outline the foundations of the literature and identify major conceptual and analytical advancements since the early 2000s, including the development of capacity investment models, the notion of intermediate institutions, and the emphasis on political agency. This review builds on research employing diverse methodologies, draws on examples from advanced economies and developing countries, and is intended for both novice and experienced readers. After taking stock of the state of the field, I discuss and reflect upon three avenues for further research—the big unknowns: Do civil wars make or break the state? How do economic openness and international hierarchy shape the incentives and opportunities for state building? And what are the perils that highly capable states pose for liberal rights and democratic governance?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Political Science
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-070723-012505
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Territorial Consolidation to Bureaucratic Dominance: The Long Arc of State Development

Didac Queralt
1 citations
Annual Review of Political Science
Regional Development and Policy
8.52
article

From Territorial Consolidation to Bureaucratic Dominance: The Long Arc of State Development

Didac Queralt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Our understanding of state development—a term that encompasses both state formation and state building—has grown significantly in the last two decades. In this review, I outline the foundations of the literature and identify major conceptual and analytical advancements since the early 2000s, including the development of capacity investment models, the notion of intermediate institutions, and the emphasis on political agency. This review builds on research employing diverse methodologies, draws on examples from advanced economies and developing countries, and is intended for both novice and experienced readers. After taking stock of the state of the field, I discuss and reflect upon three avenues for further research—the big unknowns: Do civil wars make or break the state? How do economic openness and international hierarchy shape the incentives and opportunities for state building? And what are the perils that highly capable states pose for liberal rights and democratic governance?

Annual Review of Political ScienceVol. 28(1)
Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Regional Development and Policy
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Territorial Consolidation to Bureaucratic Dominance: The Long Arc of State Development — Didac Queralt · Annual Review of Political Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS