Evaluation of perioperative lung ultrasound scores in robotic radical prostatectomy: prospective observational study

Robotic major abdominal surgeries are popular worldwide, yet very few clinical studies have investigated the effects of robotic surgery setup on respiratory outcomes. In this prospective observational study, it is aimed to demonstrate the change in ultrasonographic condition of the lungs throughout the robotic surgery and its relation with respiratory outcomes. Robotic radical prostatectomy patients without any preexisting lung or cardiac pathology were enrolled in the study. Lung ultrasound score (LUS) was chosen to evaluate lungs perioperatively in three different time points that is as follows: 5 min after intubation (T1), before extubation (T2), and 30 min after extubation (T3). Blood gas analyses were made at the same time points. Primary outcome was the change of LUS comparing T3 versus T1. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative change of LUS, severe postoperative pulmonary complication incidence, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission incidence, comparison of oxygenation via PaO<sub>2</sub> and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>, and sensitivity/specificity of LUS for determining ICU admission. Total 48 patients were analyzed. T3 LUS was significantly higher than T1 LUS, and T2 was the highest amongst (15.5 [6, 25] vs 8.5 [4, 20] vs 20.5 [13, 30], respectively, p < 0.01). Pre-extubation LUS were significantly higher in patients who were admitted to ICU comparing who were not (23.5 [17, 30] vs 20 [13, 27], p = 0.03). PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio did not change among the groups significantly (p = 0.14). ROC curve of T2LUS showed 67% sensitivity and 85% specificity with a cut-off value of 22.5 for ICU admission (AUC 0.73 [0.516, 0.937], p = 0.04). LUS significantly worsened in robotic prostatectomy throughout the surgery, yet clinical deoxygenation or severe PPC were not observed. On the other hand, pre-extubation LUS may be used to determine possible ICU admission for the patients.Clinical trial registry: This study was prospectively registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05528159).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02272-x
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of perioperative lung ultrasound scores in robotic radical prostatectomy: prospective observational study

Emre Sertaç Bingül, Faruk Özcan, Evren Aygün, Mert Canbaz et al.
2 citations
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
3.09
article

Evaluation of perioperative lung ultrasound scores in robotic radical prostatectomy: prospective observational study

Emre Sertaç Bingül, Faruk Özcan, Evren Aygün, Mert Canbaz, Meltem Savran Karadeniz, Mehmet Şanlı, İrem Vuran Yaz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Robotic major abdominal surgeries are popular worldwide, yet very few clinical studies have investigated the effects of robotic surgery setup on respiratory outcomes. In this prospective observational study, it is aimed to demonstrate the change in ultrasonographic condition of the lungs throughout the robotic surgery and its relation with respiratory outcomes. Robotic radical prostatectomy patients without any preexisting lung or cardiac pathology were enrolled in the study. Lung ultrasound score (LUS) was chosen to evaluate lungs perioperatively in three different time points that is as follows: 5 min after intubation (T1), before extubation (T2), and 30 min after extubation (T3). Blood gas analyses were made at the same time points. Primary outcome was the change of LUS comparing T3 versus T1. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative change of LUS, severe postoperative pulmonary complication incidence, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission incidence, comparison of oxygenation via PaO<sub>2</sub> and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>, and sensitivity/specificity of LUS for determining ICU admission. Total 48 patients were analyzed. T3 LUS was significantly higher than T1 LUS, and T2 was the highest amongst (15.5 [6, 25] vs 8.5 [4, 20] vs 20.5 [13, 30], respectively, p < 0.01). Pre-extubation LUS were significantly higher in patients who were admitted to ICU comparing who were not (23.5 [17, 30] vs 20 [13, 27], p = 0.03). PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio did not change among the groups significantly (p = 0.14). ROC curve of T2LUS showed 67% sensitivity and 85% specificity with a cut-off value of 22.5 for ICU admission (AUC 0.73 [0.516, 0.937], p = 0.04). LUS significantly worsened in robotic prostatectomy throughout the surgery, yet clinical deoxygenation or severe PPC were not observed. On the other hand, pre-extubation LUS may be used to determine possible ICU admission for the patients.Clinical trial registry: This study was prospectively registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05528159).

Journal of Robotic SurgeryVol. 19(1)
Bayburt State Hospital (TR), Liv Hospital (TR), Istanbul University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.