Comparing manual and automated methods for calculating speaking rate in Parkinson's disease

This study compared manual and automated methods for calculating speaking rate in recorded samples from individuals with Parkinson's disease. The manual procedure involved trained researchers measuring speaking rate through manual counting and acoustic analysis of speech units and pauses, while the automated method utilized a custom praat script developed by de Jong and Wempe [(2009). Behav. Res. Methods 41(2), 385-390]. Results indicated moderate agreement between methods, strongest when the automated script was optimized per speaker. Despite the limitations of an automated approach, this research supports the potential of automation in speaking rate analysis and provides a basis for future refinement in clinical and research contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JASA Express Letters
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0036021
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing manual and automated methods for calculating speaking rate in Parkinson's disease

Kaila L. Stipancic, Kris Tjaden, Jeremy D.W. Greenlee, Lian J. Arzbecker
1 citations
JASA Express Letters
Phonetics and Phonology Research
2.12
article

Comparing manual and automated methods for calculating speaking rate in Parkinson's disease

Kaila L. Stipancic, Kris Tjaden, Jeremy D.W. Greenlee, Lian J. Arzbecker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study compared manual and automated methods for calculating speaking rate in recorded samples from individuals with Parkinson's disease. The manual procedure involved trained researchers measuring speaking rate through manual counting and acoustic analysis of speech units and pauses, while the automated method utilized a custom praat script developed by de Jong and Wempe [(2009). Behav. Res. Methods 41(2), 385-390]. Results indicated moderate agreement between methods, strongest when the automated script was optimized per speaker. Despite the limitations of an automated approach, this research supports the potential of automation in speaking rate analysis and provides a basis for future refinement in clinical and research contexts.

JASA Express LettersVol. 5(3)
University of Iowa (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.