Expression Dynamics and Genetic Compensation of Cell Cycle Paralogues in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Cell cycle progression of the yeast <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> is largely driven by the expression of cyclins, which in turn bind the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK1 providing specificity. Due to the duplication of the yeast genome during evolution, most of the cyclins are present as a pair of paralogues, which are considered to have similar functions and periods of expression. Here, we use single molecule inexpensive fluorescence in situ hybridization (smiFISH) to measure the expression of five pairs of paralogous genes relevant for cell cycle progression (<i>CLN1</i>/<i>CLN2</i>, <i>CLB5</i>/<i>CLB6</i>, <i>CLB3</i>/<i>CLB4</i>, <i>CLB1</i>/<i>CLB2</i> and <i>ACE2</i>/<i>SWI5</i>) in a large number of unsynchronized single cells representing all cell cycle phases. We systematically compare their expression patterns and strengths. In addition, we also analyze the effect of the knockout of one part of each pair on the expression of the other gene. In order to classify cells into specific cell cycle phases, we developed a convolutional neural network (CNN). We find that the expression levels of some cell-cycle related paralogues differ in their correlation, with <i>CLN1</i> and <i>CLN2</i> showing strong correlation and <i>CLB3</i> and <i>CLB4</i> showing weakest correlation. The temporal profiles of some pairs also differ. Upon deletion of their paralogue, <i>CLB1</i> and <i>CLB2</i> seem to compensate for the expression of the other gene, while this was not observed for <i>ACE2</i>/<i>SWI5</i>. Interestingly, <i>CLB1</i> and <i>CLB2</i> also seem to share work between mother and bud in the G2 phase, where <i>CLB2</i> is primarily expressed in the bud and <i>CLB1</i> in the mother. Taken together, our results suggest that paralogues related to yeast cell cycle progression should not be considered as the same but differ both in their expression strength and timing as well in their precise role in cell cycle regulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cells
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14060412
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fungal and yeast genetics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expression Dynamics and Genetic Compensation of Cell Cycle Paralogues in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Edda Klipp, Florian Renner, Asya Polat, Philipp Lorenz et al.
2 citations
Cells
Fungal and yeast genetics research
1.61
article

Expression Dynamics and Genetic Compensation of Cell Cycle Paralogues in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Edda Klipp, Florian Renner, Asya Polat, Philipp Lorenz, Gabriele Schreiber, Facundo Rueda
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Cell cycle progression of the yeast <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> is largely driven by the expression of cyclins, which in turn bind the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK1 providing specificity. Due to the duplication of the yeast genome during evolution, most of the cyclins are present as a pair of paralogues, which are considered to have similar functions and periods of expression. Here, we use single molecule inexpensive fluorescence in situ hybridization (smiFISH) to measure the expression of five pairs of paralogous genes relevant for cell cycle progression (<i>CLN1</i>/<i>CLN2</i>, <i>CLB5</i>/<i>CLB6</i>, <i>CLB3</i>/<i>CLB4</i>, <i>CLB1</i>/<i>CLB2</i> and <i>ACE2</i>/<i>SWI5</i>) in a large number of unsynchronized single cells representing all cell cycle phases. We systematically compare their expression patterns and strengths. In addition, we also analyze the effect of the knockout of one part of each pair on the expression of the other gene. In order to classify cells into specific cell cycle phases, we developed a convolutional neural network (CNN). We find that the expression levels of some cell-cycle related paralogues differ in their correlation, with <i>CLN1</i> and <i>CLN2</i> showing strong correlation and <i>CLB3</i> and <i>CLB4</i> showing weakest correlation. The temporal profiles of some pairs also differ. Upon deletion of their paralogue, <i>CLB1</i> and <i>CLB2</i> seem to compensate for the expression of the other gene, while this was not observed for <i>ACE2</i>/<i>SWI5</i>. Interestingly, <i>CLB1</i> and <i>CLB2</i> also seem to share work between mother and bud in the G2 phase, where <i>CLB2</i> is primarily expressed in the bud and <i>CLB1</i> in the mother. Taken together, our results suggest that paralogues related to yeast cell cycle progression should not be considered as the same but differ both in their expression strength and timing as well in their precise role in cell cycle regulation.

CellsVol. 14(6)
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Fungal and yeast genetics research
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.