Raphia, 217 BCE: The battlefield

The Battle of Raphia (June 22, 217 BC), the main battle of the Fourth Syrian War between the Seleucid ruler Antiochus III and the Egyptian king Ptolemy IV, was one of the largest in Ancient history and at the same time one of the most underestimated. For a long time, based on Polybius'sfairly detailedaccount, researchers concluded that the generals lacked skill. Only in the late1970sB.Bar-Kochva and E.Galili in their publications did attempt to reassess the course of the battle and reconstruct it based on topographic data. Relying on the same quotes by Polybius and taking advantage of the fact that he does not provide an exact description of the terrain, they come to different conclusions and localize the battlefield in different places. Their interesting arguments help to clarify some passages in Polybius and interpret certain tactical decisions of different commanders, although they are certainly not immune to criticism. Nevertheless, the main thing uniting both of them them is that they are, in their own way (in each case), offer rather convincing attempt to refute the old historiographical viewpoint stating so-called «decline» of Hellenistic military art after Alexander the Great. Both studies remain relevant to this day.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Samara Journal of Science
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55355/snv2024134201
Primary Topic
Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Raphia, 217 BCE: The battlefield

Arkady Abakumov
Samara Journal of Science
Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
article

Raphia, 217 BCE: The battlefield

Arkady Abakumov
article en

Abstract

The Battle of Raphia (June 22, 217 BC), the main battle of the Fourth Syrian War between the Seleucid ruler Antiochus III and the Egyptian king Ptolemy IV, was one of the largest in Ancient history and at the same time one of the most underestimated. For a long time, based on Polybius'sfairly detailedaccount, researchers concluded that the generals lacked skill. Only in the late1970sB.Bar-Kochva and E.Galili in their publications did attempt to reassess the course of the battle and reconstruct it based on topographic data. Relying on the same quotes by Polybius and taking advantage of the fact that he does not provide an exact description of the terrain, they come to different conclusions and localize the battlefield in different places. Their interesting arguments help to clarify some passages in Polybius and interpret certain tactical decisions of different commanders, although they are certainly not immune to criticism. Nevertheless, the main thing uniting both of them them is that they are, in their own way (in each case), offer rather convincing attempt to refute the old historiographical viewpoint stating so-called «decline» of Hellenistic military art after Alexander the Great. Both studies remain relevant to this day.

Samara Journal of ScienceVol. 13(4)
Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.