Does Google dream of electric memes? From human to computational culture

Introduction. We provide a cultural heritage informatic study of ‘internet memes’: clusters of documents carrying a collective cultural meaning. Method. Google’s computer vision data from three memes are used to discuss the cultural heritage Google provides for the indexed web using Gini coefficients and word clouds. Results. Our networks suggest that the more reducible sense-data is to a smaller number of labels, the less the internet needs to ‘remember’ to see a ‘meme’. However, when labels are less strongly connected, human inspection is required to interpret if Google captures qualities of memes. Conclusions. We show that Google can interpret aspects of memetic cultural heritage. However, it fails at understanding some cultural information about memes relative to predefined expectation. Computational tools like Google Cloud Vision can augment the heterogeneity of cultural heritage work. However closer inspection from experts is needed to interpret when computational methods represent cultural memory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Research an international electronic journal
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30iconf47350
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Big Data and Digital Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Google dream of electric memes? From human to computational culture

Jeff Hemsley, Alexander O. Smith, Una Joh
2 citations
Information Research an international electronic journal
Big Data and Digital Economy
6.49
article

Does Google dream of electric memes? From human to computational culture

Jeff Hemsley, Alexander O. Smith, Una Joh
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Introduction. We provide a cultural heritage informatic study of ‘internet memes’: clusters of documents carrying a collective cultural meaning. Method. Google’s computer vision data from three memes are used to discuss the cultural heritage Google provides for the indexed web using Gini coefficients and word clouds. Results. Our networks suggest that the more reducible sense-data is to a smaller number of labels, the less the internet needs to ‘remember’ to see a ‘meme’. However, when labels are less strongly connected, human inspection is required to interpret if Google captures qualities of memes. Conclusions. We show that Google can interpret aspects of memetic cultural heritage. However, it fails at understanding some cultural information about memes relative to predefined expectation. Computational tools like Google Cloud Vision can augment the heterogeneity of cultural heritage work. However closer inspection from experts is needed to interpret when computational methods represent cultural memory.

Information Research an international electronic journalVol. 30(iConf)
Syracuse University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Big Data and Digital Economy
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does Google dream of electric memes? From human to computational culture — Jeff Hemsley, Alexander O. Smith, et al. · Information Research an international electronic journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS