How does digital humanities research talk about AI? A bibliometric analysis

Introduction. Despite scholarly work that looked into artificial intelligence (AI)’s impact on digital humanities (DH), there has been little comprehensive investigation into how AI has been reflected and adopted in DH scholarship. This paper addresses this gap by asking: What patterns can be observed in AI integration in the DH scholarly discourse? Method. A bibliometric analysis was conducted on 2,488 abstracts of articles published in three influential DH journals: digital scholarship in the humanities, digital humanities quarterly, and journal of cultural analytics. Analysis. Focusing on abstracts containing the term ‘AI’ or ‘artificial intelligence,’ this study conducted four analyses: (1) temporal analysis of AI mentions, (2) collocation analysis, (3) word vector analysis, and (4) topic modeling. Results. AI has been discussed in DH scholarship well before its recent rise in prominence. The recurring themes in these discussions encompass both technological and human-centred aspects. Conclusions. AI has been integral to DH, and the discourse around AI in DH reflects the field’s dual focus on technology and the humanities. The bibliometric analysis presented in this paper illustrates how information science can inform and guide methodological reflections in DH, offering new insights into the future development of the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Research an international electronic journal
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30iconf47242
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How does digital humanities research talk about AI? A bibliometric analysis

Rongqian Ma, Wenyi Shang, Heather Lea Moulaison
Information Research an international electronic journal
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

How does digital humanities research talk about AI? A bibliometric analysis

Rongqian Ma, Wenyi Shang, Heather Lea Moulaison
article en

Abstract

Introduction. Despite scholarly work that looked into artificial intelligence (AI)’s impact on digital humanities (DH), there has been little comprehensive investigation into how AI has been reflected and adopted in DH scholarship. This paper addresses this gap by asking: What patterns can be observed in AI integration in the DH scholarly discourse? Method. A bibliometric analysis was conducted on 2,488 abstracts of articles published in three influential DH journals: digital scholarship in the humanities, digital humanities quarterly, and journal of cultural analytics. Analysis. Focusing on abstracts containing the term ‘AI’ or ‘artificial intelligence,’ this study conducted four analyses: (1) temporal analysis of AI mentions, (2) collocation analysis, (3) word vector analysis, and (4) topic modeling. Results. AI has been discussed in DH scholarship well before its recent rise in prominence. The recurring themes in these discussions encompass both technological and human-centred aspects. Conclusions. AI has been integral to DH, and the discourse around AI in DH reflects the field’s dual focus on technology and the humanities. The bibliometric analysis presented in this paper illustrates how information science can inform and guide methodological reflections in DH, offering new insights into the future development of the field.

Information Research an international electronic journalVol. 30(iConf)
Indiana University Bloomington (US), University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.