Kinetics of Precipitation Hardening Phases in Recycled 2017A Aluminum Alloy

This study investigated the effect of the recycling process on the microstructure, hardness, and precipitation kinetics of strengthening phases in the 2017A aluminum alloy. Light microscopy (LM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses revealed that the as-cast microstructure of the recycled 2017A alloy contained intermetallic phases, including θ-Al<sub>2</sub>Cu, β-Mg<sub>2</sub>Si, Al<sub>7</sub>Cu<sub>2</sub>Fe, Q-Al<sub>4</sub>Cu<sub>2</sub>Mg<sub>8</sub>Si<sub>7</sub>, and α-Al<sub>15</sub>(FeMn)<sub>3</sub>(SiCu)<sub>2</sub>, and was comparable to that of the primary alloy, confirming its potential for high-performance applications. During solution heat treatment, most of the primary intermetallic precipitates, such as Al<sub>2</sub>Cu, Mg<sub>2</sub>Si, and Q-Al<sub>4</sub>Cu<sub>2</sub>Mg<sub>8</sub>Si<sub>7</sub>, dissolved into the solid Al matrix. DSC analysis of the solution-treated alloy established the precipitation sequence as follows: α-ss → GP/GPB zones → θ″ → θ'/Q' → θ-Al<sub>2</sub>Cu/Q-Al<sub>4</sub>Cu<sub>2</sub>Mg<sub>8</sub>Si<sub>7</sub>. The combined results from XRD, LM, TEM, and DSC confirmed that both θ and Q phases contributed to strengthening, with θ″ and θ' phases playing a dominant role. Brinell hardness measurements during natural and artificial aging revealed that hardness increased with aging time, reaching a maximum value of 150.5 HB after ~22 h of artificial aging at 175 °C. The precipitation kinetics of the recycled 2017A alloy was studied via DSC measurements over a temperature range of ~25 to 550 °C, at heating rates of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 °C/min. The peak temperatures of clusters, GP zones, and hardening phases (θ', θ″, θ, and Q) were analyzed to calculate the activation energy using mathematical models (Kissinger, Ozawa, and Boswell). The obtained values of activation energies of discontinuous precipitation were comparable across methods, with values for the θ″ phase of 89.94 kJ·mol<sup>-1</sup> (Kissinger), 98.7 kJ·mol<sup>-1</sup> (Ozawa), and 94.33 kJ·mol<sup>-1</sup> (Boswell), while for the θ' phase, they were 72.5 kJ·mol<sup>-1</sup> (Kissinger), 81.9 kJ·mol<sup>-1</sup> (Ozawa), and 77.2 kJ·mol<sup>-1</sup> (Boswell). These findings highlighted the feasibility of using recycled 2017A aluminum alloy for structural applications requiring high strength and durability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18061235
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kinetics of Precipitation Hardening Phases in Recycled 2017A Aluminum Alloy

Grzegorz Boczkal, G. Mrówka-Nowotnik, Damian Nabel
3 citations
Materials
Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
14.98
article

Kinetics of Precipitation Hardening Phases in Recycled 2017A Aluminum Alloy

Grzegorz Boczkal, G. Mrówka-Nowotnik, Damian Nabel
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of the recycling process on the microstructure, hardness, and precipitation kinetics of strengthening phases in the 2017A aluminum alloy. Light microscopy (LM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses revealed that the as-cast microstructure of the recycled 2017A alloy contained intermetallic phases, including θ-Al<sub>2</sub>Cu, β-Mg<sub>2</sub>Si, Al<sub>7</sub>Cu<sub>2</sub>Fe, Q-Al<sub>4</sub>Cu<sub>2</sub>Mg<sub>8</sub>Si<sub>7</sub>, and α-Al<sub>15</sub>(FeMn)<sub>3</sub>(SiCu)<sub>2</sub>, and was comparable to that of the primary alloy, confirming its potential for high-performance applications. During solution heat treatment, most of the primary intermetallic precipitates, such as Al<sub>2</sub>Cu, Mg<sub>2</sub>Si, and Q-Al<sub>4</sub>Cu<sub>2</sub>Mg<sub>8</sub>Si<sub>7</sub>, dissolved into the solid Al matrix. DSC analysis of the solution-treated alloy established the precipitation sequence as follows: α-ss → GP/GPB zones → θ″ → θ'/Q' → θ-Al<sub>2</sub>Cu/Q-Al<sub>4</sub>Cu<sub>2</sub>Mg<sub>8</sub>Si<sub>7</sub>. The combined results from XRD, LM, TEM, and DSC confirmed that both θ and Q phases contributed to strengthening, with θ″ and θ' phases playing a dominant role. Brinell hardness measurements during natural and artificial aging revealed that hardness increased with aging time, reaching a maximum value of 150.5 HB after ~22 h of artificial aging at 175 °C. The precipitation kinetics of the recycled 2017A alloy was studied via DSC measurements over a temperature range of ~25 to 550 °C, at heating rates of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 °C/min. The peak temperatures of clusters, GP zones, and hardening phases (θ', θ″, θ, and Q) were analyzed to calculate the activation energy using mathematical models (Kissinger, Ozawa, and Boswell). The obtained values of activation energies of discontinuous precipitation were comparable across methods, with values for the θ″ phase of 89.94 kJ·mol<sup>-1</sup> (Kissinger), 98.7 kJ·mol<sup>-1</sup> (Ozawa), and 94.33 kJ·mol<sup>-1</sup> (Boswell), while for the θ' phase, they were 72.5 kJ·mol<sup>-1</sup> (Kissinger), 81.9 kJ·mol<sup>-1</sup> (Ozawa), and 77.2 kJ·mol<sup>-1</sup> (Boswell). These findings highlighted the feasibility of using recycled 2017A aluminum alloy for structural applications requiring high strength and durability.

MaterialsVol. 18(6)
Rzeszów University of Technology (PL), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
14.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.