COVID‐19 Patients Benefitting From Remdesivir for Improved Survival: A Neural Network‐Based Approach

Conflicting results from randomized trials regarding the efficacy of remdesivir for COVID-19 have been reported. We aimed to develop a neural network (NN) to identify COVID-19 patients who would derive the greatest survival benefit from remdesivir. This multicenter observational study included adults hospitalized for COVID-19 between February 2020 and February 2021. A derivation cohort from Hospital Clínic (Barcelona) was used to create the NN, which was split into 928/1160 (80%) for training and 232/1160 (20%) for internal validation. The model used three normalized input variables: Ct values from rRT-PCR, lymphocyte count at diagnosis, and the duration of symptoms before testing. Effectiveness was assessed in an external validation cohort of 898 patients from Hospital Mútua Terrassa and Hospital Universitari La Fe, Valencia. In the derivation cohort (median age 66 years; IQR 55-78), symptom duration, Ct values, and lymphocyte count showed considerable variation. Overall, 60-day mortality was 165/1160 (14.2%). In the training set, 385/928 (41.5%) patients were identified as benefiting from remdesivir, characterized by lower Ct values, reduced lymphocyte counts, and shorter symptom duration. Mortality in this subgroup was 93/385 (24.2%): 6/385 (7.2%) in patients receiving remdesivir versus 87/385 (28.8%) in those who did not (p < 0.001). In the test set, 296/898 (33%) patients were identified as high-benefit, with 60-day mortality rates of 8/296 (11%) for those patients treated with remdesivir compared to 49/296 (22%) for those not treated (p < 0.04). In conclusion, we successfully developed and validated a NN capable of identifying patients with distinct clinical phenotypes who are at higher risk of mortality without remdesivir.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Virology
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.70276
Citations
1
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COVID‐19 Patients Benefitting From Remdesivir for Improved Survival: A Neural Network‐Based Approach

Patricia Monzó, María Ángeles Marcos, Àlex Soriano, Olivier Peyrony et al.
1 citations
Journal of Medical Virology
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
1.40
article

COVID‐19 Patients Benefitting From Remdesivir for Improved Survival: A Neural Network‐Based Approach

Patricia Monzó, María Ángeles Marcos, Àlex Soriano, Olivier Peyrony, Raúl Méndez, Mariana Chumbita, Elena Sebastián, Rosario Menéndez, Tommaso Francesco Aiello, Mónica Ballestero-Téllez, Carolina García‐Vidal, Genoveva Cuesta, Antonio Gallardo‐Pizarro, Christian Teijón‐Lumbreras, Josep Mensa, José Antonio Martínez, Aina Mateu Subirà
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Conflicting results from randomized trials regarding the efficacy of remdesivir for COVID-19 have been reported. We aimed to develop a neural network (NN) to identify COVID-19 patients who would derive the greatest survival benefit from remdesivir. This multicenter observational study included adults hospitalized for COVID-19 between February 2020 and February 2021. A derivation cohort from Hospital Clínic (Barcelona) was used to create the NN, which was split into 928/1160 (80%) for training and 232/1160 (20%) for internal validation. The model used three normalized input variables: Ct values from rRT-PCR, lymphocyte count at diagnosis, and the duration of symptoms before testing. Effectiveness was assessed in an external validation cohort of 898 patients from Hospital Mútua Terrassa and Hospital Universitari La Fe, Valencia. In the derivation cohort (median age 66 years; IQR 55-78), symptom duration, Ct values, and lymphocyte count showed considerable variation. Overall, 60-day mortality was 165/1160 (14.2%). In the training set, 385/928 (41.5%) patients were identified as benefiting from remdesivir, characterized by lower Ct values, reduced lymphocyte counts, and shorter symptom duration. Mortality in this subgroup was 93/385 (24.2%): 6/385 (7.2%) in patients receiving remdesivir versus 87/385 (28.8%) in those who did not (p < 0.001). In the test set, 296/898 (33%) patients were identified as high-benefit, with 60-day mortality rates of 8/296 (11%) for those patients treated with remdesivir compared to 49/296 (22%) for those not treated (p < 0.04). In conclusion, we successfully developed and validated a NN capable of identifying patients with distinct clinical phenotypes who are at higher risk of mortality without remdesivir.

Journal of Medical VirologyVol. 97(3)
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe (ES), Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (ES), Departament de Salut (ES), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Mútua Terrassa (ES), Hôpital Saint-Louis (FR), Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.