Using the K‐Means Node Clustering Method and ROC Curve Analysis to Define Cut‐Off Scores for the Caregiving System Scale

This study was conducted to establish cut-off scores for the subscales of the Caregiving System Scale (CSS). Two samples of Italian adults (N's = 682 and 227) completed the CSS. In the first sample, K-means node clustering and ROC curve analyses were conducted. Four caregiving profiles were identified and cut-off scores were calculated for classifying participants into these profiles. In the second sample, participants completed the CSS and the Attachment Style Questionnaire. Findings supported the presence of unique CSS profiles and meaningful connections between them and attachment orientations. This work offers a method for determining cut-off scores when gold-standard measures needed to run ROC curve analyses are unavailable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Psychology
Published
2025-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.70038
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using the K‐Means Node Clustering Method and ROC Curve Analysis to Define Cut‐Off Scores for the Caregiving System Scale

Mario Mikulincer, Phillip R. Shaver, Daiana Colledani, Anna Maria Meneghini
2 citations
International Journal of Psychology
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
4.88
article

Using the K‐Means Node Clustering Method and ROC Curve Analysis to Define Cut‐Off Scores for the Caregiving System Scale

Mario Mikulincer, Phillip R. Shaver, Daiana Colledani, Anna Maria Meneghini
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study was conducted to establish cut-off scores for the subscales of the Caregiving System Scale (CSS). Two samples of Italian adults (N's = 682 and 227) completed the CSS. In the first sample, K-means node clustering and ROC curve analyses were conducted. Four caregiving profiles were identified and cut-off scores were calculated for classifying participants into these profiles. In the second sample, participants completed the CSS and the Attachment Style Questionnaire. Findings supported the presence of unique CSS profiles and meaningful connections between them and attachment orientations. This work offers a method for determining cut-off scores when gold-standard measures needed to run ROC curve analyses are unavailable.

International Journal of PsychologyVol. 60(2)
University of Verona (IT), Reichman University (IL), University of California, Davis (US), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.