Cost‐Effectiveness of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in COVID‐19 Patients at High‐Risk for Progression in Spain

The objective was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r) in treating adults with COVID-19 at high-risk of developing severe COVID-19 who do not require supplemental oxygen, compared to no treatment, from the Spanish National Health System (NHS) perspective. A decision-tree for the first year followed by a two-state Markov model with annual cycles for a lifetime horizon was developed. A cohort of 1000 high-risk, symptomatic COVID-19 patients entered the decision-tree for each comparator, divided into hospitalized patients, considering their level of care, and outpatients, for whom only symptom duration was considered. Vaccination status of patients and COVID-19-specific mortality for hospitalized patients were considered. NMV/r efficacy in reducing hospitalizations, deaths and symptom days was applied. Patient quality of life and costs were included (€2024). All the parameters and assumptions were validated by experts. The model reported outputs including costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost per QALY gained. NMV/r was dominant compared to no treatment, with a decrease in cost per patient of €169.69 and an increase in QALYs of 0.05. NMV/r is a dominant option compared to no treatment in high-risk adult patients with symptomatic COVID-19 not requiring supplemental oxygen, from the Spanish NHS perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Virology
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.70288
Citations
1
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost‐Effectiveness of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in COVID‐19 Patients at High‐Risk for Progression in Spain

José Ramón Azanza Perea, José Molero, Àlex Soriano, Alfonso de Lossada et al.
1 citations
Journal of Medical Virology
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
1.40
article

Cost‐Effectiveness of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in COVID‐19 Patients at High‐Risk for Progression in Spain

José Ramón Azanza Perea, José Molero, Àlex Soriano, Alfonso de Lossada, Tendai Mugwagwa, Carla Garí, V. López-Gómez, Juan González del Castillo, Alba Bellmunt, R Germán Ferrando, Carmen Peral
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The objective was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r) in treating adults with COVID-19 at high-risk of developing severe COVID-19 who do not require supplemental oxygen, compared to no treatment, from the Spanish National Health System (NHS) perspective. A decision-tree for the first year followed by a two-state Markov model with annual cycles for a lifetime horizon was developed. A cohort of 1000 high-risk, symptomatic COVID-19 patients entered the decision-tree for each comparator, divided into hospitalized patients, considering their level of care, and outpatients, for whom only symptom duration was considered. Vaccination status of patients and COVID-19-specific mortality for hospitalized patients were considered. NMV/r efficacy in reducing hospitalizations, deaths and symptom days was applied. Patient quality of life and costs were included (€2024). All the parameters and assumptions were validated by experts. The model reported outputs including costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost per QALY gained. NMV/r was dominant compared to no treatment, with a decrease in cost per patient of €169.69 and an increase in QALYs of 0.05. NMV/r is a dominant option compared to no treatment in high-risk adult patients with symptomatic COVID-19 not requiring supplemental oxygen, from the Spanish NHS perspective.

Journal of Medical VirologyVol. 97(3)
Pfizer (United Kingdom) (GB), Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Hospital General Universitari de Castelló (ES), Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES), Pfizer (Spain) (ES), Fundación Andrés Marcio (ES)
Pfizer
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.