Bidirectional Relationships Between Peer Defending and Social Status in Elementary and High School Students

This study evaluated the bidirectional associations between peer defending and social status (perceived popularity and likability) as well as gender and grade differences in these associations. Cross-lagged panel models were used to assess these longitudinal relationships in a sample comprised of elementary school students (Grades 5-8, N = 301, M<sub>age</sub> = 12.38, collected in May and November 2019) and high school students (Grades 9-12, N = 296, M<sub>age</sub> = 15.69, collected in November 2022 and May 2023) collected from five schools in southern Ontario, Canada. Findings revealed that overall, popularity and likability predicted future peer defending, and students who defended others became more liked over time. Additionally, our exploratory analyses indicated that boys in elementary school who defended became more popular overtime. These findings extend previous investigations into the bidirectional associations between social status and peer defending, while considering the impacts of gender and cohort. Implications of these findings are discussed in terms of their novelty and considerations for bullying prevention programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aggressive Behavior
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.70024
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bidirectional Relationships Between Peer Defending and Social Status in Elementary and High School Students

Laura J. Lambe, Natalie Spadafora, Wendy Craig, Cameron Hines
2 citations
Aggressive Behavior
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
4.88
article

Bidirectional Relationships Between Peer Defending and Social Status in Elementary and High School Students

Laura J. Lambe, Natalie Spadafora, Wendy Craig, Cameron Hines
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study evaluated the bidirectional associations between peer defending and social status (perceived popularity and likability) as well as gender and grade differences in these associations. Cross-lagged panel models were used to assess these longitudinal relationships in a sample comprised of elementary school students (Grades 5-8, N = 301, M<sub>age</sub> = 12.38, collected in May and November 2019) and high school students (Grades 9-12, N = 296, M<sub>age</sub> = 15.69, collected in November 2022 and May 2023) collected from five schools in southern Ontario, Canada. Findings revealed that overall, popularity and likability predicted future peer defending, and students who defended others became more liked over time. Additionally, our exploratory analyses indicated that boys in elementary school who defended became more popular overtime. These findings extend previous investigations into the bidirectional associations between social status and peer defending, while considering the impacts of gender and cohort. Implications of these findings are discussed in terms of their novelty and considerations for bullying prevention programs.

Aggressive BehaviorVol. 51(2)
Brock University (CA), St. Francis Xavier University (CA), Queen's University (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.