Are policy shocks to forest products footprint permanent or temporary? Evidence from 128 countries

Sustainable environmental policies are important for future generations to live in a more livable world. Therefore, the environmental damage of the policies implemented is expected to be minimized. In this way, the effects of environmental shocks can be temporary. Rather than analyzing ecological footprint as a deductive approach, analyzing the smaller components that cause ecological footprint will make a different contribution to the literature. For this reason, forest products footprint analysis affecting ecological footprint was investigated. In order to analyze the permanent or temporary nature of environmental shocks, forest product footprint, which is one of the variables used in the calculation of environmental damage, is used for 128 countries covering the period of 1961–2022. We used three different tests in this study. Firstly, the PANIC unit root test, which developed in 2003, secondly the PANIC with sharp breaks test, which developed in 2009 and finally the PANIC with dummy factor break unit root test, which developed in 2022, is used to calculate the permanent and temporary of shocks. According to results of the PANIC with dummy factor break unit root test with two breaks and without trend effect, environmental shocks have a permanent effect in 110 countries and in the model with trend effect, environmental shocks are permanent in 103 countries. In countries where policy shocks are temporary, permanent structural reforms are needed to prevent deforestation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forest Research
Published
2025-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13416979.2025.2475526
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are policy shocks to forest products footprint permanent or temporary? Evidence from 128 countries

Muhammad Shahbaz, Cüneyt Kılıç, Ahmet Tayfur Akcan, Semanur Soyyiğit
2 citations
Journal of Forest Research
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
6.26
article

Are policy shocks to forest products footprint permanent or temporary? Evidence from 128 countries

Muhammad Shahbaz, Cüneyt Kılıç, Ahmet Tayfur Akcan, Semanur Soyyiğit
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Sustainable environmental policies are important for future generations to live in a more livable world. Therefore, the environmental damage of the policies implemented is expected to be minimized. In this way, the effects of environmental shocks can be temporary. Rather than analyzing ecological footprint as a deductive approach, analyzing the smaller components that cause ecological footprint will make a different contribution to the literature. For this reason, forest products footprint analysis affecting ecological footprint was investigated. In order to analyze the permanent or temporary nature of environmental shocks, forest product footprint, which is one of the variables used in the calculation of environmental damage, is used for 128 countries covering the period of 1961–2022. We used three different tests in this study. Firstly, the PANIC unit root test, which developed in 2003, secondly the PANIC with sharp breaks test, which developed in 2009 and finally the PANIC with dummy factor break unit root test, which developed in 2022, is used to calculate the permanent and temporary of shocks. According to results of the PANIC with dummy factor break unit root test with two breaks and without trend effect, environmental shocks have a permanent effect in 110 countries and in the model with trend effect, environmental shocks are permanent in 103 countries. In countries where policy shocks are temporary, permanent structural reforms are needed to prevent deforestation.

Journal of Forest ResearchVol. 30(4)
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi (TR), Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Gulf University for Science & Technology (KW), Kırklareli University (TR), Necmettin Erbakan University (TR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Are policy shocks to forest products footprint permanent or temporary? Evidence from 128 countries — Muhammad Shahbaz, Cüneyt Kılıç, et al. · Journal of Forest Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS