Accuracy of Neuronavigation Guided Lateral Mass Screw Fixation in Cervical Spine Disorders

Background: Lateral mass screw fixation is a widely used technique for cervical spine stabilization, but its accuracy remains a critical concern due to the risk of neurovascular injury and malpositioned screws. Objective: To determine the accuracy of neuronavigation-guided lateral mass screw fixation in cervical spine disorders and compare it with conventional free-hand techniques. Methods: This Descriptive study was conducted at Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Hospital, Lahore from 03 August 2024 till 03 February 2025. Data were collected through Non-probability, consecutive sampling. Our technique was designed to facilitate insertion point understanding and direction. The insertion point was initially determined using preoperative CT. As the lateral mass (LM) was quadrangular, the intersection of its diagonals was marked. Results: The mean age of the patients was 38.74 ± 9.29 years, with 62.81% males and 37.19% females. The most commonly affected cervical levels were C4 (24.79%) and C7 (23.97%). Neuronavigation demonstrated an accuracy rate of 91.4%, with only 8.6% of screws showing malposition. Accuracy was slightly higher in males (92.0%) compared to females (90.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Cervical level-based accuracy showed the highest precision at C4 (94.0%) and the lowest at C5 (88.9%), with no significant differences (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Neuronavigation-assisted lateral mass screw fixation demonstrates high accuracy (91.4%) and safety in cervical spine stabilization. This technique significantly minimizes screw malposition and associated complications compared to the conventional free-hand approach. Its precision remains consistent across varying demographics and spinal levels, establishing it as a reliable modality in cervical spine surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Published
2025-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i3.708
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of Neuronavigation Guided Lateral Mass Screw Fixation in Cervical Spine Disorders

Amer Hayat Khan, Ammar Bin Ahsan, Shahzad Shams, Muhammad Rizwan et al.
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Accuracy of Neuronavigation Guided Lateral Mass Screw Fixation in Cervical Spine Disorders

Amer Hayat Khan, Ammar Bin Ahsan, Shahzad Shams, Muhammad Rizwan, Syed Asrar Ul Haq Andrabi, Ahtsham Ishaq, Ch.Muhammad Tajammal Saeed
article en

Abstract

Background: Lateral mass screw fixation is a widely used technique for cervical spine stabilization, but its accuracy remains a critical concern due to the risk of neurovascular injury and malpositioned screws. Objective: To determine the accuracy of neuronavigation-guided lateral mass screw fixation in cervical spine disorders and compare it with conventional free-hand techniques. Methods: This Descriptive study was conducted at Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Hospital, Lahore from 03 August 2024 till 03 February 2025. Data were collected through Non-probability, consecutive sampling. Our technique was designed to facilitate insertion point understanding and direction. The insertion point was initially determined using preoperative CT. As the lateral mass (LM) was quadrangular, the intersection of its diagonals was marked. Results: The mean age of the patients was 38.74 ± 9.29 years, with 62.81% males and 37.19% females. The most commonly affected cervical levels were C4 (24.79%) and C7 (23.97%). Neuronavigation demonstrated an accuracy rate of 91.4%, with only 8.6% of screws showing malposition. Accuracy was slightly higher in males (92.0%) compared to females (90.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Cervical level-based accuracy showed the highest precision at C4 (94.0%) and the lowest at C5 (88.9%), with no significant differences (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Neuronavigation-assisted lateral mass screw fixation demonstrates high accuracy (91.4%) and safety in cervical spine stabilization. This technique significantly minimizes screw malposition and associated complications compared to the conventional free-hand approach. Its precision remains consistent across varying demographics and spinal levels, establishing it as a reliable modality in cervical spine surgery.

Indus journal of bioscience research.Vol. 3(3)
King Edward Medical University (PK), Farooq Hospital (PK), Mayo Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.