Nevermore Algorithmic Justice: The Future and The End of Law

This article deals with the possible impact of automated decision- making on law. It argues that such could constitute a death of the law. To demonstrate this point, the article describes the underlying technological process of machine learning. It describes its negative impact on possible future reinterpretation and development of law that reflects societal development. As such, the tools of automation represent an ideal tool for the conservation of the existing status quo. Further, this article deals with the idea that for law to be just it needs to be not only personalized but always made anew in each judgement. This is also made impossible due to the described nature of the automation which makes the law not only forever cemented in its ways, denying any contestation, but rids it of any justice, which is the legitimizing element of the laws’ violence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Exceptions European Journal of Critical Jurisprudence
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4467/30718538exc.24.004.21208
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nevermore Algorithmic Justice: The Future and The End of Law

Andrej Krištofík
1 citations
Exceptions European Journal of Critical Jurisprudence
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
0.35
article

Nevermore Algorithmic Justice: The Future and The End of Law

Andrej Krištofík
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article deals with the possible impact of automated decision- making on law. It argues that such could constitute a death of the law. To demonstrate this point, the article describes the underlying technological process of machine learning. It describes its negative impact on possible future reinterpretation and development of law that reflects societal development. As such, the tools of automation represent an ideal tool for the conservation of the existing status quo. Further, this article deals with the idea that for law to be just it needs to be not only personalized but always made anew in each judgement. This is also made impossible due to the described nature of the automation which makes the law not only forever cemented in its ways, denying any contestation, but rids it of any justice, which is the legitimizing element of the laws’ violence.

Exceptions European Journal of Critical JurisprudenceVol. 1
Masaryk University (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.