Juridical Analysis of the Position of Crown Witness for the Crime of Theft in the Criminal Procedure Law

Crown witnesses are defendants who are used as witnesses to prove a criminal act committed together with the separation of case files first. So that the defendants can testify to each other reciprocally. In decision number 263/PID. B/2019/PN.Tng, Nurupi who is also a defendant in a separate case file was made a crown witness, due to the lack of evidence in the form of witnesses in the criminal case. This research is an empirical normative research, with an analytical descriptive nature. The results showed that the use of crown witnesses in the case was still effective. The obstacle to the use of crown witnesses is if the prosecution trusts crown witnesses too much. The researcher suggested that the public prosecution add other evidence so that the testimony given by crown witnesses is consistent and the evidence is accurate and accurate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration
Published
2025-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58818/ijlrsa.v3i1.186
Primary Topic
Educational Reforms and Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Juridical Analysis of the Position of Crown Witness for the Crime of Theft in the Criminal Procedure Law

Tiara Ayu Lestari, Sri Jaya Lesmana, A.A. Gede Cahya Pratama
The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration
Educational Reforms and Innovations
article

Juridical Analysis of the Position of Crown Witness for the Crime of Theft in the Criminal Procedure Law

Tiara Ayu Lestari, Sri Jaya Lesmana, A.A. Gede Cahya Pratama
article en

Abstract

Crown witnesses are defendants who are used as witnesses to prove a criminal act committed together with the separation of case files first. So that the defendants can testify to each other reciprocally. In decision number 263/PID. B/2019/PN.Tng, Nurupi who is also a defendant in a separate case file was made a crown witness, due to the lack of evidence in the form of witnesses in the criminal case. This research is an empirical normative research, with an analytical descriptive nature. The results showed that the use of crown witnesses in the case was still effective. The obstacle to the use of crown witnesses is if the prosecution trusts crown witnesses too much. The researcher suggested that the public prosecution add other evidence so that the testimony given by crown witnesses is consistent and the evidence is accurate and accurate.

The International Journal of Law Review and State AdministrationVol. 3(1)
Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Educational Reforms and Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.