Revisiting the Strategic Dimension of the Global War on Terror

This article revisits the Global War on Terror (GWOT) two decades after its declaration, critically assessing its strategic achievements and failures. It examines the evolution of terrorism as a threat and the shifting focus to state actors like Russia and China in a multipolar global order. We highlighted the limitations of militarised responses to terrorism, which have often resulted in regional instability, increased radicalisation, and diminished international trust. In addition, we described the strategic paradox of pursuing absolute security while neglecting socio-political root causes and explored how the GWOT shaped global military and political landscapes. Drawing on historical and strategic frameworks, the analysis reveals a mixed legacy of counter-terrorism efforts, suggesting the need for a balanced approach that integrates military action with diplomacy, economic development, and cultural understanding. The findings underscore the importance of reassessing global security strategies to address contemporary threats effectively in a fragmented and interdependent world.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
National security and the future
Published
2025-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37458/nstf.26.1.5
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the Strategic Dimension of the Global War on Terror

Dražen Smiljanić
National security and the future
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

Revisiting the Strategic Dimension of the Global War on Terror

Dražen Smiljanić
article en

Abstract

This article revisits the Global War on Terror (GWOT) two decades after its declaration, critically assessing its strategic achievements and failures. It examines the evolution of terrorism as a threat and the shifting focus to state actors like Russia and China in a multipolar global order. We highlighted the limitations of militarised responses to terrorism, which have often resulted in regional instability, increased radicalisation, and diminished international trust. In addition, we described the strategic paradox of pursuing absolute security while neglecting socio-political root causes and explored how the GWOT shaped global military and political landscapes. Drawing on historical and strategic frameworks, the analysis reveals a mixed legacy of counter-terrorism efforts, suggesting the need for a balanced approach that integrates military action with diplomacy, economic development, and cultural understanding. The findings underscore the importance of reassessing global security strategies to address contemporary threats effectively in a fragmented and interdependent world.

National security and the futureVol. 26(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.