Optimized gravity field retrieval for the MAGIC mission concept using background model uncertainty information

Abstract Errors in ocean tide and non-tidal atmospheric and oceanic models are among the largest error sources in gravity field recovery from space. We co-estimate corrections to these background models subject to uncertainty constraints during the adjustment procedure of gravity field spherical harmonic coefficients. Simulations are performed for the Mass-Change and Geoscience International Constellation to evaluate the effect of such a constrained procedure on monthly gravity field retrievals for the planned ESA-NASA double-pair mission. The influence of co-estimating background model corrections subject to known uncertainty information is evaluated separately for both types of background models and is then combined and used to retrieve monthly gravity fields over one year. Retrieval errors are compared to those obtained with the standard recovery procedure, which neglects these corrections. It is shown that gravity field retrieval errors are reduced by up to 36%. In addition, the one-year simulation is used to estimate residual corrections for eight major tidal constituents in order to improve ocean tide background modelling. Adding these residual corrections to the applied a priori ocean tide model shows that ocean tide errors are decreased by up to 27%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geodesy
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01931-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimized gravity field retrieval for the MAGIC mission concept using background model uncertainty information

Michael Murböck, Natalia Panafidina, Frank Flechtner, Christoph Dahle et al.
1 citations
Journal of Geodesy
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
1.79
article

Optimized gravity field retrieval for the MAGIC mission concept using background model uncertainty information

Michael Murböck, Natalia Panafidina, Frank Flechtner, Christoph Dahle, Josefine Wilms, Markus Hauk, Karl Hans Neumayer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Errors in ocean tide and non-tidal atmospheric and oceanic models are among the largest error sources in gravity field recovery from space. We co-estimate corrections to these background models subject to uncertainty constraints during the adjustment procedure of gravity field spherical harmonic coefficients. Simulations are performed for the Mass-Change and Geoscience International Constellation to evaluate the effect of such a constrained procedure on monthly gravity field retrievals for the planned ESA-NASA double-pair mission. The influence of co-estimating background model corrections subject to known uncertainty information is evaluated separately for both types of background models and is then combined and used to retrieve monthly gravity fields over one year. Retrieval errors are compared to those obtained with the standard recovery procedure, which neglects these corrections. It is shown that gravity field retrieval errors are reduced by up to 36%. In addition, the one-year simulation is used to estimate residual corrections for eight major tidal constituents in order to improve ocean tide background modelling. Adding these residual corrections to the applied a priori ocean tide model shows that ocean tide errors are decreased by up to 27%.

Journal of GeodesyVol. 99(3)
GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimized gravity field retrieval for the MAGIC mission concept using background model uncertainty information — Michael Murböck, Natalia Panafidina, et al. · Journal of Geodesy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS