Erasing Illusions: A Statutory Framework for Deletion in U.S. Data Privacy

Since the passage of the California Consumer Privacy Act in 2018, states have rushed to pass their own consumer data protection laws, filling the glaring absence of comprehensive federal privacy law in the United States. These state privacy statutes are largely modeled after the European Union’s (“EU’s”) General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which introduced the “right to be forgotten.” This right permits EU residents to request that organizations delete their personal information. U.S. state laws have followed the GDPR by adopting a “right to delete.” Yet these new state laws provide little detail about the right to delete and lack mechanisms to ensure enforcement, meaning the U.S. right to delete offers a hollow promise of consumer control. Moreover, the current U.S. privacy regime—including state common law, enforcement by state attorneys general, sector-specific federal laws, and actions by the Federal Trade Commission—fails to compensate for the bare-bones approach to deletion rights employed at the state level. Privacy statutes should include a combination of individual deletion rights and “structural” business requirements to fully protect deletion interests and create meaningful consumer control. Statutes should include broadly drafted deletion provisions, verification requirements, a private right of action, data destruction requirements, data mapping requirements, third-party deletion obligations, and agency reporting mechanisms.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Texas A&M Law Review
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37419/lr.v12.i2.10
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Erasing Illusions: A Statutory Framework for Deletion in U.S. Data Privacy

Kirsten Worden
1 citations
Texas A&M Law Review
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
article

Erasing Illusions: A Statutory Framework for Deletion in U.S. Data Privacy

Kirsten Worden
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Since the passage of the California Consumer Privacy Act in 2018, states have rushed to pass their own consumer data protection laws, filling the glaring absence of comprehensive federal privacy law in the United States. These state privacy statutes are largely modeled after the European Union’s (“EU’s”) General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which introduced the “right to be forgotten.” This right permits EU residents to request that organizations delete their personal information. U.S. state laws have followed the GDPR by adopting a “right to delete.” Yet these new state laws provide little detail about the right to delete and lack mechanisms to ensure enforcement, meaning the U.S. right to delete offers a hollow promise of consumer control. Moreover, the current U.S. privacy regime—including state common law, enforcement by state attorneys general, sector-specific federal laws, and actions by the Federal Trade Commission—fails to compensate for the bare-bones approach to deletion rights employed at the state level. Privacy statutes should include a combination of individual deletion rights and “structural” business requirements to fully protect deletion interests and create meaningful consumer control. Statutes should include broadly drafted deletion provisions, verification requirements, a private right of action, data destruction requirements, data mapping requirements, third-party deletion obligations, and agency reporting mechanisms.

Texas A&M Law ReviewVol. 12(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.