Regulating AI Therapy Chatbots: A Call for Federal Oversight

While artificial intelligence therapy chatbots continue to develop and increase in popularity, there is little regulatory oversight for this burgeoning industry. Regulation is needed because there is a high probability for harm when artificial intelligence is used in the mental health therapy industry, yet there is no consensus on standards that apply. Artificial intelligence therapy chatbots are currently only regulated by indirect, suboptimal liability schemes. State governments could regulate them by considering them human practitioners or telehealth services, or the federal government could regulate them as medical devices. This Comment examines the pitfalls of the lack of artificial intelligence therapy chatbot regulation, analyzes methods for regulation at the state and federal levels, and ultimately concludes they should be regulated federally as medical devices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Texas A&M Law Review
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37419/lr.v12.i2.9
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulating AI Therapy Chatbots: A Call for Federal Oversight

Carolyn V. Wheeler
3 citations
Texas A&M Law Review
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
article

Regulating AI Therapy Chatbots: A Call for Federal Oversight

Carolyn V. Wheeler
article en
3 citations

Abstract

While artificial intelligence therapy chatbots continue to develop and increase in popularity, there is little regulatory oversight for this burgeoning industry. Regulation is needed because there is a high probability for harm when artificial intelligence is used in the mental health therapy industry, yet there is no consensus on standards that apply. Artificial intelligence therapy chatbots are currently only regulated by indirect, suboptimal liability schemes. State governments could regulate them by considering them human practitioners or telehealth services, or the federal government could regulate them as medical devices. This Comment examines the pitfalls of the lack of artificial intelligence therapy chatbot regulation, analyzes methods for regulation at the state and federal levels, and ultimately concludes they should be regulated federally as medical devices.

Texas A&M Law ReviewVol. 12(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.