Looking Under the Hood Challenges and Remedies for Cross‐Country Surveying of Nonprofit Organizations

ABSTRACT Large‐N cross‐country surveying is a promising, yet methodologically challenging way to contextualize existing research, as it allows researchers to formulate and test hypotheses that verify under what conditions relationships are (un)likely to materialize. Integrating insights from the survey error‐ and equivalence literature with our own recent experience with cross‐country surveying, this article offers guidance on how to navigate the methodological challenges associated with cross‐country survey sampling and –measurement. Doing so, we provide a learning case that stimulates further debate about and increased engagement with large‐N cross‐country comparison in nonprofit research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21657
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Looking Under the Hood Challenges and Remedies for Cross‐Country Surveying of Nonprofit Organizations

Bram Verschuere, ChiaKo Hung, Johan Hvenmark, Ben Suykens
3 citations
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
12.60
article

Looking Under the Hood Challenges and Remedies for Cross‐Country Surveying of Nonprofit Organizations

Bram Verschuere, ChiaKo Hung, Johan Hvenmark, Ben Suykens
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Large‐N cross‐country surveying is a promising, yet methodologically challenging way to contextualize existing research, as it allows researchers to formulate and test hypotheses that verify under what conditions relationships are (un)likely to materialize. Integrating insights from the survey error‐ and equivalence literature with our own recent experience with cross‐country surveying, this article offers guidance on how to navigate the methodological challenges associated with cross‐country survey sampling and –measurement. Doing so, we provide a learning case that stimulates further debate about and increased engagement with large‐N cross‐country comparison in nonprofit research.

Nonprofit Management and LeadershipVol. 36(1)
Ghent University (BE), University of Oxford (GB), New College (GB), Marie Cederschiöld University (SE), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Harvard University, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Looking Under the Hood Challenges and Remedies for Cross‐Country Surveying of Nonprofit Organizations — Bram Verschuere, ChiaKo Hung, et al. · Nonprofit Management and Leadership (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS