And yet, what is philosophy of education? (Some considerations regarding definitions)

Introduction. The article is devoted to the consideration of available ways of understanding the philosophy of education as an independent branch of knowledge. The authors discuss a range of specific problems in the philosophy of education. They analyze the relationship between socio-philosophical, epistemological, ethical and axiological guide-lines in the development of philosophy of education. Purpose setting. The authors make an attempt to systematically present the philosophy of education as a conditionally distinguished sphere, which includes both the study of philosophical and methodological problems of some sciences and practical branches (pedagogy, didactics, methodology, design of educational courses, management of educational organizations, etc.), and reflection social and worldview problems arising in connection with educational issues. Methodology and methods of the study. During the study, the authors used methods of conceptual analysis, comparison and meaningful juxtaposition of the definitions under consideration, critically reflected on various positions regarding the understanding of the subject and the specifics of the philosophy of education, presented in domestic and foreign literature. Results. The research carried out allowed the authors to conclude that there are several strategies for constituting the philosophy of education as a discipline. The first of them is a generalization under the name «philosophy of education» of any experiences of philosophical understanding of issues that directly or indirectly relate to the upbringing, training and education of a person. The second strategy is to shape the field of philosophy of education by including within it all research into the general and methodological problems of the educational sciences. The third strategy is to integrate educational issues into a broader philosophical perspective. Conclusion. The variety of ways to understand the philosophy of education corresponds to the variety of ways of research activity. It is important that the use of a specific definition of philosophy of education is accompanied by the emergence of obligations regarding the identification and evaluation of one’s own research results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Professional education in the modern world
Published
2025-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2024-4-4
Primary Topic
Religious Education and Schools
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

And yet, what is philosophy of education? (Some considerations regarding definitions)

Светлана Петровна Штумпф, Dmitry Vladimirovich Rakhinsky, Nikita Ravochkin, M. P. Yatsenko et al.
Professional education in the modern world
Religious Education and Schools
article

And yet, what is philosophy of education? (Some considerations regarding definitions)

Светлана Петровна Штумпф, Dmitry Vladimirovich Rakhinsky, Nikita Ravochkin, M. P. Yatsenko, V. V. Mineev
article en

Abstract

Introduction. The article is devoted to the consideration of available ways of understanding the philosophy of education as an independent branch of knowledge. The authors discuss a range of specific problems in the philosophy of education. They analyze the relationship between socio-philosophical, epistemological, ethical and axiological guide-lines in the development of philosophy of education. Purpose setting. The authors make an attempt to systematically present the philosophy of education as a conditionally distinguished sphere, which includes both the study of philosophical and methodological problems of some sciences and practical branches (pedagogy, didactics, methodology, design of educational courses, management of educational organizations, etc.), and reflection social and worldview problems arising in connection with educational issues. Methodology and methods of the study. During the study, the authors used methods of conceptual analysis, comparison and meaningful juxtaposition of the definitions under consideration, critically reflected on various positions regarding the understanding of the subject and the specifics of the philosophy of education, presented in domestic and foreign literature. Results. The research carried out allowed the authors to conclude that there are several strategies for constituting the philosophy of education as a discipline. The first of them is a generalization under the name «philosophy of education» of any experiences of philosophical understanding of issues that directly or indirectly relate to the upbringing, training and education of a person. The second strategy is to shape the field of philosophy of education by including within it all research into the general and methodological problems of the educational sciences. The third strategy is to integrate educational issues into a broader philosophical perspective. Conclusion. The variety of ways to understand the philosophy of education corresponds to the variety of ways of research activity. It is important that the use of a specific definition of philosophy of education is accompanied by the emergence of obligations regarding the identification and evaluation of one’s own research results.

Professional education in the modern worldVol. 14(4)
Krasnoyarsk State Medical University (RU), Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University (RU), Kuzbass State Technical University (RU), Siberian Federal University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Religious Education and Schools
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.